[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YGbNpLKXfWpy0ZZa@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 09:54:12 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, keescook@...omium.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org, mbenes@...e.com,
ngupta@...are.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] zram: fix crashes due to use of cpu hotplug
multistate
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:59:25PM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> As for the syfs deadlock possible with drivers, this fixes it in a generic way:
>
> commit fac43d8025727a74f80a183cc5eb74ed902a5d14
> Author: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> Date: Sat Mar 27 14:58:15 2021 +0000
>
> sysfs: add optional module_owner to attribute
>
> This is needed as otherwise the owner of the attribute
> or group read/store might have a shared lock used on driver removal,
> and deadlock if we race with driver removal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
No, please no. Module removal is a "best effort", if the system dies
when it happens, that's on you. I am not willing to expend extra energy
and maintance of core things like sysfs for stuff like this that does
not matter in any system other than a developer's box.
Lock data, not code please. Trying to tie data structure's lifespans
to the lifespan of code is a tangled mess, and one that I do not want to
add to in any form.
sorry,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists