linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/16] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in core/rtw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:56:26 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, joe@...ches.com,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in
 core/rtw_xmit.c

On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:01:21PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> @@ -568,20 +561,11 @@ static s32 update_attrib_sec_info(struct adapter *padapter, struct pkt_attrib *p
>  	if (pattrib->encrypt > 0)
>  		memcpy(pattrib->dot118021x_UncstKey.skey, psta->dot118021x_UncstKey.skey, 16);
>  
> -	RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_xmit_c_, _drv_info_,
> -		("update_attrib: encrypt =%d  securitypriv.sw_encrypt =%d\n",
> -		pattrib->encrypt, padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt));
> -
>  	if (pattrib->encrypt &&
> -		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
> +		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt) || (!psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted)))

You've done too much clean up here.  Just remove the { but leave the
== true/false comparisons.

If the patch is only changing five lines or code then fixing checkpatch
warnings on the line of code you are changing is fine, but in this case
you're doing a bunch of changes and these sort of cleanups make it hard
to review.

Ease to spot that the curly brace changed:
-		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
+		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false)))

Hard to spot:
-		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
+		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt) || (!psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted)))

regards,
dan carpenter