linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/16] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in core/rtw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210402124045.GA1420@agape.jhs>
Date:   Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:40:46 +0200
From:   Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, joe@...ches.com,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in
 core/rtw_xmit.c

On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 02:56:26PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:01:21PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > @@ -568,20 +561,11 @@ static s32 update_attrib_sec_info(struct adapter *padapter, struct pkt_attrib *p
> >  	if (pattrib->encrypt > 0)
> >  		memcpy(pattrib->dot118021x_UncstKey.skey, psta->dot118021x_UncstKey.skey, 16);
> >  
> > -	RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_xmit_c_, _drv_info_,
> > -		("update_attrib: encrypt =%d  securitypriv.sw_encrypt =%d\n",
> > -		pattrib->encrypt, padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt));
> > -
> >  	if (pattrib->encrypt &&
> > -		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
> > +		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt) || (!psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted)))
> 
> You've done too much clean up here.  Just remove the { but leave the
> == true/false comparisons.
> 
> If the patch is only changing five lines or code then fixing checkpatch
> warnings on the line of code you are changing is fine, but in this case
> you're doing a bunch of changes and these sort of cleanups make it hard
> to review.
> 
> Ease to spot that the curly brace changed:
> -		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
> +		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false)))
> 
> Hard to spot:
> -		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
> +		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt) || (!psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted)))
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

thank you Dan, it's a good tuning process for me. Shall I resend the
whole patchset? Maybe some of them are ok...

fabio