linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/16] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in core/rtw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210402125448.GC1420@agape.jhs>
Date:   Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:54:49 +0200
From:   Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     dan.carpenter@...cle.com, joe@...ches.com,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in
 core/rtw_xmit.c

On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 02:47:10PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 02:40:46PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 02:56:26PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:01:21PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > > > @@ -568,20 +561,11 @@ static s32 update_attrib_sec_info(struct adapter *padapter, struct pkt_attrib *p
> > > >  	if (pattrib->encrypt > 0)
> > > >  		memcpy(pattrib->dot118021x_UncstKey.skey, psta->dot118021x_UncstKey.skey, 16);
> > > >  
> > > > -	RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_xmit_c_, _drv_info_,
> > > > -		("update_attrib: encrypt =%d  securitypriv.sw_encrypt =%d\n",
> > > > -		pattrib->encrypt, padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt));
> > > > -
> > > >  	if (pattrib->encrypt &&
> > > > -		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
> > > > +		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt) || (!psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted)))
> > > 
> > > You've done too much clean up here.  Just remove the { but leave the
> > > == true/false comparisons.
> > > 
> > > If the patch is only changing five lines or code then fixing checkpatch
> > > warnings on the line of code you are changing is fine, but in this case
> > > you're doing a bunch of changes and these sort of cleanups make it hard
> > > to review.
> > > 
> > > Ease to spot that the curly brace changed:
> > > -		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
> > > +		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false)))
> > > 
> > > Hard to spot:
> > > -		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
> > > +		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt) || (!psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted)))
> > > 
> > > regards,
> > > dan carpenter
> > > 
> > 
> > thank you Dan, it's a good tuning process for me. Shall I resend the
> > whole patchset? Maybe some of them are ok...
> 
> Yes please, you do not want me to pick and choose individual patches out
> of this series.  Our tools grab the whole series at once to apply them.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

ok, got it,

thank you for your patience,:)

fabio