lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210402130512.h7vkbxdwn7errxmh@revolver>
Date:   Fri, 2 Apr 2021 13:05:19 +0000
From:   Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>
To:     Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
CC:     Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
        Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
        Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org" <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alpha/kernel/traps: Use find_vma_intersection() in traps
 for setting si_code

* Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> [210401 16:25]:
> You are correct that find_vma is insufficient for what's intended
> here, and that find_vma_intersection fixes it.
> 
> I'll let the arch maintainers speak of what the consequences of the
> changed si_code would be - the bug has been here so long, that I would
> worry some userspace might have come to depend on it (the old "common
> law feature" issue).

Fair point.  Is this a valid concern given the result will vary,
although uncommon, based on the address passed in?  A user would see
different behaviour based on where the address lands in the virtual
address space.

>  Just a concern I have, with 0 evidence behind it, so I hope it turns
> out not to be an actual issue.
> 
> Acked-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
> 
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:51 PM Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > find_vma() will continue to search upwards until the end of the virtual
> > memory space.  This means the si_code would almost never be set to
> > SEGV_MAPERR even when the address falls outside of any VMA.
> >
> > Using find_vma_intersection() allows for what is intended by only
> > returning a VMA if it falls within the range provided, in this case a
> > window of 1.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c
> > index 921d4b6e4d95..7f51386c06d0 100644
> > --- a/arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c
> > +++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c
> > @@ -957,8 +957,10 @@ do_entUnaUser(void __user * va, unsigned long opcode,
> >                 si_code = SEGV_ACCERR;
> >         else {
> >                 struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> > +               unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)va;
> > +
> >                 mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > -               if (find_vma(mm, (unsigned long)va))
> > +               if (find_vma_intersection(mm, addr, addr + 1))
> >                         si_code = SEGV_ACCERR;
> >                 else
> >                         si_code = SEGV_MAPERR;
> > --
> > 2.30.0
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
> A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ