lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4a060a1-8cf3-71f8-9f4a-498870a9cb53@benettiengineering.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Apr 2021 17:23:18 +0200
From:   Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ettiengineering.com>
To:     Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...math.org>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.ne@...teo.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Input: add driver for the Hycon HY46XX touchpanel
 series

Hi Jonathan,

On 4/2/21 10:59 AM, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> a few remarks below.
> 
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 01:03:58AM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>> This patch adds support for Hycon HY46XX.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ettiengineering.com>
>> ---
>> V1->V2:
>> * removed proximity-sensor-switch property according to previous patch
>> As suggested by Dmitry Torokhov
>> * moved i2c communaction to regmap use
>> * added macro to avoid magic number
>> * removed cmd variable that could uninitiliazed since we're using regmap now
>> * removed useless byte masking
>> * removed useless struct hycon_hy46xx_i2c_chip_data
>> * used IRQF_ONESHOT only for isr
>> ---
> 
> 
>> +config TOUCHSCREEN_HYCON_HY46XX
>> +	tristate "Hycon hy46xx touchscreen support"
>> +	depends on I2C
>> +	help
>> +	  Say Y here if you have a touchscreen using Hycon hy46xx,
>> +	  or something similar enough.
> 
> The "something similar enough" part doesn't seem relevant, because the
> driver only lists HY46xx chips (in the compatible strings), and no chips
> that are similar enough to work with the driver, but have a different
> part number.

Right

>> +static void hycon_hy46xx_get_defaults(struct device *dev, struct hycon_hy46xx_data *tsdata)
>> +{
>> +	bool val_bool;
>> +	int error;
>> +	u32 val;
>> +
>> +	error = device_property_read_u32(dev, "threshold", &val);
> 
> This seems to follow the old version of the binding, where
> Hycon-specific properties didn't have the "hycon," prefix.
> Please check that the driver still works with a devicetree that follows
> the newest version of the binding.

Ah yes, I've forgotten it while changing in bindings.

>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>");
> 
> This is a different email address than you used in the DT binding. If
> this is intentional, no problem (Just letting you know, in case it's
> unintentional).

I've missed that

> 
> Thanks,
> Jonathan Neuschäfer
> 

Thank you!
Best regards
-- 
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ