linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: split receive_fd_replace from __receive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202104021157.7B388D1B2@keescook>
Date:   Fri, 2 Apr 2021 12:01:05 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: split receive_fd_replace from __receive_fd

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:22:09AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> receive_fd_replace shares almost no code with the general case, so split
> it out.  Also remove the "Bump the sock usage counts" comment from
> both copies, as that is now what __receive_sock actually does.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

I'm okay with repeating code in fs/file.c. What I wanted to avoid was
open coded combinations in various callers.

So, sure, this can be split, but as-is the patch breaks SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210329071939.GC3633@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook