[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210402164014.53c84f05@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 16:40:14 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/debug: Use sched_debug_lock to serialize use
of cgroup_path[] only
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 14:10:30 -0400
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
> The handling of sysrq key can be activated by echoing the key to
> /proc/sysrq-trigger or via the magic key sequence typed into a terminal
> that is connected to the system in some way (serial, USB or other mean).
> In the former case, the handling is done in a user context. In the
> latter case, it is likely to be in an interrupt context.
>
> There should be no more than one instance of sysrq key processing via
> a terminal, but multiple instances of /proc/sysrq-trigger is possible.
>
> Currently in print_cpu() of kernel/sched/debug.c, sched_debug_lock is
> taken with interrupt disabled for the whole duration of the calls to
> print_*_stats() and print_rq() which could last for the quite some time
> if the information dump happens on the serial console.
>
> If the system has many cpus and the sched_debug_lock is somehow busy
> (e.g. parallel sysrq-t), the system may hit a hard lockup panic
> depending on the actually serial console implementation of the
> system. For instance,
Wouldn't placing strategically located "touch_nmi_watchdog()"s around fix
this?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists