[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210402212131.835276-1-dlatypov@google.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:21:29 -0700
From: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To: brendanhiggins@...gle.com
Cc: davidgow@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, alan.maguire@...cle.com,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/2] kunit: fail tests on UBSAN errors
v1 by Uriel is here: [1].
Since it's been a while, I've dropped the Reviewed-By's.
It depended on commit 83c4e7a0363b ("KUnit: KASAN Integration") which
hadn't been merged yet, so that caused some kerfuffle with applying them
previously and the series was reverted.
This revives the series but makes the kunit_fail_current_test() function
take a format string and logs the file and line number of the failing
code, addressing Alan Maguire's comments on the previous version.
As a result, the patch that makes UBSAN errors was tweaked slightly to
include an error message.
v2 -> v3:
Try and fail to make kunit_fail_current_test() work on CONFIG_KUNIT=m
s/_/__ on the helper func to match others in test.c
v3 -> v4:
Revert to only enabling kunit_fail_current_test() for CONFIG_KUNIT=y
v4 -> v5:
Delete blank line to make checkpatch.pl --strict happy
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200806174326.3577537-1-urielguajardojr@gmail.com/
Uriel Guajardo (2):
kunit: support failure from dynamic analysis tools
kunit: ubsan integration
include/kunit/test-bug.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/kunit/test.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
lib/ubsan.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/kunit/test-bug.h
base-commit: 1678e493d530e7977cce34e59a86bb86f3c5631e
--
2.31.0.208.g409f899ff0-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists