linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable dueclocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Apr 2021 15:37:19 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
        sboyd@...nel.org, corbet@....net, Mark.Rutland@....com,
        maz@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com, neeraju@...eaurora.org,
        ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable
 dueclocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog

On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:22:40AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02 2021 at 13:31, paulmck wrote:
> 
> The subsystem prefix does not parse:
> 
>     [PATCH v6 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable dueclocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog

Where is that brown bag when I need it?  :-/

> I look at the actual code changes after the easter break.

I will resend a clean copy as a reply to your message.

							Thanx, Paul