lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list] 
Date:   Sat, 03 Apr 2021 12:18:20 -0700
From:   syzbot <syzbot+c18f2f6a7b08c51e3025@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org,
        miklos@...redi.hu, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in ovl_maybe_copy_up

syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    454c576c Add linux-next specific files for 20210401
git tree:       linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1616e07ed00000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=920cc274cae812a5
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c18f2f6a7b08c51e3025
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=13da365ed00000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=13ca9d16d00000

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+c18f2f6a7b08c51e3025@...kaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.12.0-rc5-next-20210401-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor144/9166 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888144cf0460 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ovl_maybe_copy_up+0x11f/0x190 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:995

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880256d42c0 (&iint->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: process_measurement+0x3a8/0x17e0 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:253

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&iint->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:949 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x139/0x1120 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1096
       process_measurement+0x3a8/0x17e0 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:253
       ima_file_check+0xb9/0x100 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:499
       do_open fs/namei.c:3361 [inline]
       path_openat+0x15b5/0x27e0 fs/namei.c:3492
       do_filp_open+0x17e/0x3c0 fs/namei.c:3519
       do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x420 fs/open.c:1187
       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1203 [inline]
       __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1211 [inline]
       __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1207 [inline]
       __x64_sys_open+0x119/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1207
       do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #0 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2938 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3676 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2a17/0x5230 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4902
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5512 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x740 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5477
       percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
       __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1758 [inline]
       sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1828 [inline]
       mnt_want_write+0x6e/0x3e0 fs/namespace.c:375
       ovl_maybe_copy_up+0x11f/0x190 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:995
       ovl_open+0xba/0x270 fs/overlayfs/file.c:149
       do_dentry_open+0x4b9/0x11b0 fs/open.c:826
       vfs_open fs/open.c:940 [inline]
       dentry_open+0x132/0x1d0 fs/open.c:956
       ima_calc_file_hash+0x2d2/0x4b0 security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c:557
       ima_collect_measurement+0x4ca/0x570 security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c:252
       process_measurement+0xd1c/0x17e0 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:330
       ima_file_check+0xb9/0x100 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:499
       do_open fs/namei.c:3361 [inline]
       path_openat+0x15b5/0x27e0 fs/namei.c:3492
       do_filp_open+0x17e/0x3c0 fs/namei.c:3519
       do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x420 fs/open.c:1187
       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1203 [inline]
       __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1211 [inline]
       __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1207 [inline]
       __x64_sys_open+0x119/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1207
       do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&iint->mutex);
                               lock(sb_writers#5);
                               lock(&iint->mutex);
  lock(sb_writers#5);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor144/9166:
 #0: ffff8880256d42c0 (&iint->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: process_measurement+0x3a8/0x17e0 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:253

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 9166 Comm: syz-executor144 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc5-next-20210401-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2129
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2938 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3676 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x2a17/0x5230 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4902
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5512 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x740 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5477
 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
 __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1758 [inline]
 sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1828 [inline]
 mnt_want_write+0x6e/0x3e0 fs/namespace.c:375
 ovl_maybe_copy_up+0x11f/0x190 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:995
 ovl_open+0xba/0x270 fs/overlayfs/file.c:149
 do_dentry_open+0x4b9/0x11b0 fs/open.c:826
 vfs_open fs/open.c:940 [inline]
 dentry_open+0x132/0x1d0 fs/open.c:956
 ima_calc_file_hash+0x2d2/0x4b0 security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c:557
 ima_collect_measurement+0x4ca/0x570 security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c:252
 process_measurement+0xd1c/0x17e0 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:330
 ima_file_check+0xb9/0x100 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:499
 do_open fs/namei.c:3361 [inline]
 path_openat+0x15b5/0x27e0 fs/namei.c:3492
 do_filp_open+0x17e/0x3c0 fs/namei.c:3519
 do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x420 fs/open.c:1187
 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1203 [inline]
 __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1211 [inline]
 __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1207 [inline]
 __x64_sys_open+0x119/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1207
 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x446109
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 41 15 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fe4412f12f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004cb4c0 RCX: 0000000000446109
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000007 RDI: 00000000200001c0
RBP: 000000000049b06c R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 69662f7375622f2e
R13: 79706f636174656d R14: 0079616c7265766f R15: 00000000004cb4c8

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ