linux-kernel - Re: [External] [PATCH 2/3] mm: Charge active memcg when no mm is set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZfGtVwxo-UMq8RD_2hpLAbhhYzSkDi_J7kQOJ3yzFz=-5USQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 3 Apr 2021 13:47:05 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
        "open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
Subject: Re: [External] [PATCH 2/3] mm: Charge active memcg when no mm is set

On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 3:17 AM Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com> wrote:
>
> set_active_memcg() worked for kernel allocations but was silently
> ignored for user pages.
>
> This patch establishes a precedence order for who gets charged:
>
> 1. If there is a memcg associated with the page already, that memcg is
>    charged. This happens during swapin.
>
> 2. If an explicit mm is passed, mm->memcg is charged. This happens
>    during page faults, which can be triggered in remote VMs (eg gup).
>
> 3. Otherwise consult the current process context. If there is an
>    active_memcg, use that. Otherwise, current->mm->memcg.
>
> Previously, if a NULL mm was passed to mem_cgroup_charge (case 3) it
> would always charge the root cgroup. Now it looks up the active_memcg
> first (falling back to charging the root cgroup if not set).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>

Thanks.