[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b43d3738-391b-cfab-d20d-fb6fd30752b1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 19:17:43 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 3/9] net: dsa: qca: ar9331: reorder MDIO write
sequence
On 4/3/2021 04:48, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> In case of this switch we work with 32bit registers on top of 16bit
> bus. Some registers (for example access to forwarding database) have
> trigger bit on the first 16bit half of request and the result +
> configuration of request in the second half. Without this this patch, we would
> trigger database operation and overwrite result in one run.
>
> To make it work properly, we should do the second part of transfer
> before the first one is done.
>
> So far, this rule seems to work for all registers on this switch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Seems like you could send this as a separate bugfix for the "net" tree
along with a Fixes tag?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists