[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2021 11:45:11 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: ecree.xilinx@...il.com, habetsm.xilinx@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] sfc: Use 'skb_add_rx_frag()' instead of hand coding it
Some lines of code can be merged into an equivalent 'skb_add_rx_frag()'
call which is less verbose.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
---
UNTESTED. Compile tested only
The 'skb->truesize' computation is likely to be slightly slower (n
additions hidden in 'skb_add_rx_frag' instead of 1 multiplication), but I
don't think that it is an issue here.
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
index 89c5c75f479f..17b8119c48e5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
@@ -94,12 +94,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *efx_rx_mk_skb(struct efx_channel *channel,
rx_buf->len -= hdr_len;
for (;;) {
- skb_fill_page_desc(skb, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags,
- rx_buf->page, rx_buf->page_offset,
- rx_buf->len);
+ skb_add_rx_frag(skb, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags,
+ rx_buf->page, rx_buf->page_offset,
+ rx_buf->len, efx->rx_buffer_truesize);
rx_buf->page = NULL;
- skb->len += rx_buf->len;
- skb->data_len += rx_buf->len;
+
if (skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags == n_frags)
break;
@@ -111,8 +110,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *efx_rx_mk_skb(struct efx_channel *channel,
n_frags = 0;
}
- skb->truesize += n_frags * efx->rx_buffer_truesize;
-
/* Move past the ethernet header */
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, efx->net_dev);
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists