lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 5 Apr 2021 09:43:39 +0200
From:   Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Harry Wei <harryxiyou@...il.com>,
        Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...a.pv.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] docs: make reporting-issues.rst official and
 delete reporting-bugs.rst

On 31.03.21 21:47, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> 
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:13:04PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> Removing Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-bugs.rst will break links
>>> in some of the translations. I was unsure if simply changing them to
>>> Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issue.rst was wise, so I didn't
>>> touch anything for now and CCed the maintainers for the Chinese and
>>> Italian translation. I couldn't find one for the Japanse translation.
>>
>> Traditionally translations catch up much later on, you shouldn't have to
>> worry about them the authors will clean them up and submit patches for
>> them when they get the chance.
> 
> Agreed.  None of the broken references actually generate warnings
> (though perhaps some should) so we can let the translators catch up on
> their own time.

Ahh, good to know.

BTW to the translators in the CC: sorry for not giving you a heads up
earlier, things were supposed to get slower, but then had to be
accelerated.

> I've applied the set and stuck in this tweak:
> 
>> FWIW, this needs a
>>
>>  s!stable/>_`!stable/>`_!
>>
>> Sorry, this slipped through. :-/ Ciao, Thorsten
> 
> while I was at it.

Great, thx everyone, that what I had hoped for when I posted it.

BTW, can't see the patches in docs-next yet, but I just assume it's just
not pushed out yet for some reason. Whatever.

Side note, FWIW: I have no further patches for the text in my queue, but
I might sent one depending on how fast the new mailing list
linux-regressions will be created (will as for that later today).

Ciao, Thorsten


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ