linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] driver core: add helper for deferred probe reason setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 5 Apr 2021 10:31:29 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] driver core: add helper for deferred probe reason
 setting

On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 10:27:56AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Greg,
> 
> On 23.03.21 16:37, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > We now have three places within the same file doing the same operation
> > of freeing this pointer and setting it anew. A helper makes this
> > arguably easier to read, so add one.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
> 
> are there still objections to this patch?
> Patch 1 was applied, should I resend without?

No, I'll queue this up now, I wanted patch 1 to show up in my "next"
branch first, it's now there, give me a chance to catch up on patches...

thanks,

greg k-h