[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCv0x3-A3PruJJ6wmzBZ5544Zj8_R7wFXkOm6H-a5tG406wYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 13:10:47 -0700
From: Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: property: do not create device links from *nr-gpios
Hi Saravana,
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 1:01 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 8:14 PM Ilya Lipnitskiy
> <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > [<vendor>,]nr-gpios property is used by some GPIO drivers[0] to indicate
> > the number of GPIOs present on a system, not define a GPIO. nr-gpios is
> > not configured by #gpio-cells and can't be parsed along with other
> > "*-gpios" properties.
> >
> > scripts/dtc/checks.c also has a special case for nr-gpio{s}. However,
> > nr-gpio is not really special, so we only need to fix nr-gpios suffix
> > here.
>
> The only example of this that I see is "snps,nr-gpios".
arch/arm64/boot/dts/apm/apm-shadowcat.dtsi uses "apm,nr-gpios", with
parsing code in drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c. There is also code in
drivers/gpio/gpio-adnp.c and drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c using
"nr-gpios" without any vendor prefix.
I personally don't think causing regressions is good for any reason,
so I think we need to fix this in stable releases. The patch can be
reverted when nr-gpios is no longer special. The logic here should
also be aligned with scripts/dtc/checks.c, I actually submitted a
patch to warn about "nr-gpios" only and not "nr-gpio" in dtc as well:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree-compiler/msg03619.html
Ilya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists