[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210405085031.696287678@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 10:53:02 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 020/126] kernel: freezer should treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD for freezing
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
[ Upstream commit 15b2219facadec583c24523eed40fa45865f859f ]
Don't send fake signals to PF_IO_WORKER threads, they don't accept
signals. Just treat them like kthreads in this regard, all they need
is a wakeup as no forced kernel/user transition is needed.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
kernel/freezer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/freezer.c b/kernel/freezer.c
index dc520f01f99d..1a2d57d1327c 100644
--- a/kernel/freezer.c
+++ b/kernel/freezer.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ bool freeze_task(struct task_struct *p)
return false;
}
- if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+ if (!(p->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_IO_WORKER)))
fake_signal_wake_up(p);
else
wake_up_state(p, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
--
2.30.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists