linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 065/126] KVM: SVM: load control fields from VMCB12 before checking them

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210405085033.210655053@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  5 Apr 2021 10:53:47 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Felix Wilhelm <fwilhelm@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 065/126] KVM: SVM: load control fields from VMCB12 before checking them

From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>

commit a58d9166a756a0f4a6618e4f593232593d6df134 upstream.

Avoid races between check and use of the nested VMCB controls.  This
for example ensures that the VMRUN intercept is always reflected to the
nested hypervisor, instead of being processed by the host.  Without this
patch, it is possible to end up with svm->nested.hsave pointing to
the MSR permission bitmap for nested guests.

This bug is CVE-2021-29657.

Reported-by: Felix Wilhelm <fwilhelm@...gle.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 2fcf4876ada ("KVM: nSVM: implement on demand allocation of the nested state")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c |   10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static bool nested_vmcb_check_controls(s
 	return true;
 }
 
-static bool nested_vmcb_checks(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb12)
+static bool nested_vmcb_check_save(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb12)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
 	bool vmcb12_lma;
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static bool nested_vmcb_checks(struct vc
 	if (kvm_valid_cr4(&svm->vcpu, vmcb12->save.cr4))
 		return false;
 
-	return nested_vmcb_check_controls(&vmcb12->control);
+	return true;
 }
 
 static void load_nested_vmcb_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
@@ -454,7 +454,6 @@ int enter_svm_guest_mode(struct vcpu_svm
 	int ret;
 
 	svm->nested.vmcb12_gpa = vmcb12_gpa;
-	load_nested_vmcb_control(svm, &vmcb12->control);
 	nested_prepare_vmcb_save(svm, vmcb12);
 	nested_prepare_vmcb_control(svm);
 
@@ -501,7 +500,10 @@ int nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *sv
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!svm->nested.initialized))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (!nested_vmcb_checks(svm, vmcb12)) {
+	load_nested_vmcb_control(svm, &vmcb12->control);
+
+	if (!nested_vmcb_check_save(svm, vmcb12) ||
+	    !nested_vmcb_check_controls(&svm->nested.ctl)) {
 		vmcb12->control.exit_code    = SVM_EXIT_ERR;
 		vmcb12->control.exit_code_hi = 0;
 		vmcb12->control.exit_info_1  = 0;