| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20210405085035.545987518@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 10:53:08 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.11 039/152] io_uring: call req_set_fail_links() on short send[msg]()/recv[msg]() with MSG_WAITALL
From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>
[ Upstream commit 0031275d119efe16711cd93519b595e6f9b4b330 ]
Without that it's not safe to use them in a linked combination with
others.
Now combinations like IORING_OP_SENDMSG followed by IORING_OP_SPLICE
should be possible.
We already handle short reads and writes for the following opcodes:
- IORING_OP_READV
- IORING_OP_READ_FIXED
- IORING_OP_READ
- IORING_OP_WRITEV
- IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED
- IORING_OP_WRITE
- IORING_OP_SPLICE
- IORING_OP_TEE
Now we have it for these as well:
- IORING_OP_SENDMSG
- IORING_OP_SEND
- IORING_OP_RECVMSG
- IORING_OP_RECV
For IORING_OP_RECVMSG we also check for the MSG_TRUNC and MSG_CTRUNC
flags in order to call req_set_fail_links().
There might be applications arround depending on the behavior
that even short send[msg]()/recv[msg]() retuns continue an
IOSQE_IO_LINK chain.
It's very unlikely that such applications pass in MSG_WAITALL,
which is only defined in 'man 2 recvmsg', but not in 'man 2 sendmsg'.
It's expected that the low level sock_sendmsg() call just ignores
MSG_WAITALL, as MSG_ZEROCOPY is also ignored without explicitly set
SO_ZEROCOPY.
We also expect the caller to know about the implicit truncation to
MAX_RW_COUNT, which we don't detect.
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c4e1a4cc0d905314f4d5dc567e65a7b09621aab3.1615908477.git.metze@samba.org
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 26b4af9831da..2b0b9c3dda33 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -4628,6 +4628,7 @@ static int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
struct io_async_msghdr iomsg, *kmsg;
struct socket *sock;
unsigned flags;
+ int min_ret = 0;
int ret;
sock = sock_from_file(req->file);
@@ -4654,6 +4655,9 @@ static int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
else if (force_nonblock)
flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT;
+ if (flags & MSG_WAITALL)
+ min_ret = iov_iter_count(&kmsg->msg.msg_iter);
+
ret = __sys_sendmsg_sock(sock, &kmsg->msg, flags);
if (force_nonblock && ret == -EAGAIN)
return io_setup_async_msg(req, kmsg);
@@ -4663,7 +4667,7 @@ static int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
if (kmsg->iov != kmsg->fast_iov)
kfree(kmsg->iov);
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < min_ret)
req_set_fail_links(req);
__io_req_complete(req, ret, 0, cs);
return 0;
@@ -4677,6 +4681,7 @@ static int io_send(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
struct iovec iov;
struct socket *sock;
unsigned flags;
+ int min_ret = 0;
int ret;
sock = sock_from_file(req->file);
@@ -4698,6 +4703,9 @@ static int io_send(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
else if (force_nonblock)
flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT;
+ if (flags & MSG_WAITALL)
+ min_ret = iov_iter_count(&msg.msg_iter);
+
msg.msg_flags = flags;
ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
if (force_nonblock && ret == -EAGAIN)
@@ -4705,7 +4713,7 @@ static int io_send(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
ret = -EINTR;
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < min_ret)
req_set_fail_links(req);
__io_req_complete(req, ret, 0, cs);
return 0;
@@ -4857,6 +4865,7 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
struct socket *sock;
struct io_buffer *kbuf;
unsigned flags;
+ int min_ret = 0;
int ret, cflags = 0;
sock = sock_from_file(req->file);
@@ -4892,6 +4901,9 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
else if (force_nonblock)
flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT;
+ if (flags & MSG_WAITALL)
+ min_ret = iov_iter_count(&kmsg->msg.msg_iter);
+
ret = __sys_recvmsg_sock(sock, &kmsg->msg, req->sr_msg.umsg,
kmsg->uaddr, flags);
if (force_nonblock && ret == -EAGAIN)
@@ -4904,7 +4916,7 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
if (kmsg->iov != kmsg->fast_iov)
kfree(kmsg->iov);
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < min_ret || ((flags & MSG_WAITALL) && (kmsg->msg.msg_flags & (MSG_TRUNC | MSG_CTRUNC))))
req_set_fail_links(req);
__io_req_complete(req, ret, cflags, cs);
return 0;
@@ -4920,6 +4932,7 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
struct socket *sock;
struct iovec iov;
unsigned flags;
+ int min_ret = 0;
int ret, cflags = 0;
sock = sock_from_file(req->file);
@@ -4950,6 +4963,9 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
else if (force_nonblock)
flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT;
+ if (flags & MSG_WAITALL)
+ min_ret = iov_iter_count(&msg.msg_iter);
+
ret = sock_recvmsg(sock, &msg, flags);
if (force_nonblock && ret == -EAGAIN)
return -EAGAIN;
@@ -4958,7 +4974,7 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
out_free:
if (req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED)
cflags = io_put_recv_kbuf(req);
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < min_ret || ((flags & MSG_WAITALL) && (msg.msg_flags & (MSG_TRUNC | MSG_CTRUNC))))
req_set_fail_links(req);
__io_req_complete(req, ret, cflags, cs);
return 0;
--
2.30.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists