[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210405085035.941084892@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 10:53:20 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, TOTE Robot <oslab@...nghua.edu.cn>,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.11 051/152] net: bonding: fix error return code of bond_neigh_init()
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 2055a99da8a253a357bdfd359b3338ef3375a26c ]
When slave is NULL or slave_ops->ndo_neigh_setup is NULL, no error
return code of bond_neigh_init() is assigned.
To fix this bug, ret is assigned with -EINVAL in these cases.
Fixes: 9e99bfefdbce ("bonding: fix bond_neigh_init()")
Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@...nghua.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 5fe5232cc3f3..fba6b6d1b430 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3917,11 +3917,15 @@ static int bond_neigh_init(struct neighbour *n)
rcu_read_lock();
slave = bond_first_slave_rcu(bond);
- if (!slave)
+ if (!slave) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
+ }
slave_ops = slave->dev->netdev_ops;
- if (!slave_ops->ndo_neigh_setup)
+ if (!slave_ops->ndo_neigh_setup) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
+ }
/* TODO: find another way [1] to implement this.
* Passing a zeroed structure is fragile,
--
2.30.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists