[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877dlhf3ae.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 11:12:41 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Cc: eric.auger.pro@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
drjones@...hat.com, alexandru.elisei@....com, james.morse@....com,
suzuki.poulose@....com, shuah@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] KVM/ARM: Some vgic fixes and init sequence KVM selftests
Hi Eric,
On Sun, 04 Apr 2021 18:22:35 +0100,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> While writting vgic v3 init sequence KVM selftests I noticed some
> relatively minor issues. This was also the opportunity to try to
> fix the issue laterly reported by Zenghui, related to the RDIST_TYPER
> last bit emulation. The final patch is a first batch of VGIC init
> sequence selftests. Of course they can be augmented with a lot more
> register access tests, but let's try to move forward incrementally ...
>
> Best Regards
>
> Eric
>
> This series can be found at:
> https://github.com/eauger/linux/tree/vgic_kvmselftests_v5
>
> History:
> v4 -> v5:
> - rewrite the last bit detection according to Marc's
> interpretation of the spec and modify the kvm selftests
> accordingly
Have you dropped v4's patch #1? It did seem to fix an actual issue,
didn't it?
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists