linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] KVM/ARM: Some vgic fixes and init sequence KVM selftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 05 Apr 2021 11:12:41 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Cc:     eric.auger.pro@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        drjones@...hat.com, alexandru.elisei@....com, james.morse@....com,
        suzuki.poulose@....com, shuah@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] KVM/ARM: Some vgic fixes and init sequence KVM selftests

Hi Eric,

On Sun, 04 Apr 2021 18:22:35 +0100,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> While writting vgic v3 init sequence KVM selftests I noticed some
> relatively minor issues. This was also the opportunity to try to
> fix the issue laterly reported by Zenghui, related to the RDIST_TYPER
> last bit emulation. The final patch is a first batch of VGIC init
> sequence selftests. Of course they can be augmented with a lot more
> register access tests, but let's try to move forward incrementally ...
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Eric
> 
> This series can be found at:
> https://github.com/eauger/linux/tree/vgic_kvmselftests_v5
> 
> History:
> v4 -> v5:
> - rewrite the last bit detection according to Marc's
>   interpretation of the spec and modify the kvm selftests
>   accordingly

Have you dropped v4's patch #1? It did seem to fix an actual issue,
didn't it?

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.