[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c21edd64-396c-4c7c-86f8-79045321a528@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 08:27:16 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Avihai Horon <avihaih@...dia.com>,
Adit Ranadive <aditr@...are.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
Bernard Metzler <bmt@...ich.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@...adcom.com>,
Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...os.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Lijun Ou <oulijun@...wei.com>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>,
"Md. Haris Iqbal" <haris.iqbal@...os.com>,
Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@...dia.com>,
Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@...vell.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Naresh Kumar PBS <nareshkumar.pbs@...adcom.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@...lsio.com>,
rds-devel@....oracle.com, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>,
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>,
Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
VMware PV-Drivers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Weihang Li <liweihang@...wei.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 01/10] RDMA: Add access flags to ib_alloc_mr()
and ib_mr_pool_init()
On 4/4/21 10:23 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> index bed4cfe50554..59138174affa 100644
> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> @@ -2444,10 +2444,10 @@ struct ib_device_ops {
> struct ib_udata *udata);
> int (*dereg_mr)(struct ib_mr *mr, struct ib_udata *udata);
> struct ib_mr *(*alloc_mr)(struct ib_pd *pd, enum ib_mr_type mr_type,
> - u32 max_num_sg);
> + u32 max_num_sg, u32 access);
> struct ib_mr *(*alloc_mr_integrity)(struct ib_pd *pd,
> u32 max_num_data_sg,
> - u32 max_num_meta_sg);
> + u32 max_num_meta_sg, u32 access);
> int (*advise_mr)(struct ib_pd *pd,
> enum ib_uverbs_advise_mr_advice advice, u32 flags,
> struct ib_sge *sg_list, u32 num_sge,
> @@ -4142,11 +4142,10 @@ static inline int ib_dereg_mr(struct ib_mr *mr)
> }
>
> struct ib_mr *ib_alloc_mr(struct ib_pd *pd, enum ib_mr_type mr_type,
> - u32 max_num_sg);
> + u32 max_num_sg, u32 access);
>
> -struct ib_mr *ib_alloc_mr_integrity(struct ib_pd *pd,
> - u32 max_num_data_sg,
> - u32 max_num_meta_sg);
> +struct ib_mr *ib_alloc_mr_integrity(struct ib_pd *pd, u32 max_num_data_sg,
> + u32 max_num_meta_sg, u32 access);
>
> /**
> * ib_update_fast_reg_key - updates the key portion of the fast_reg MR
> diff --git a/include/rdma/mr_pool.h b/include/rdma/mr_pool.h
> index e77123bcb43b..2a0ee791037d 100644
> --- a/include/rdma/mr_pool.h
> +++ b/include/rdma/mr_pool.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ struct ib_mr *ib_mr_pool_get(struct ib_qp *qp, struct list_head *list);
> void ib_mr_pool_put(struct ib_qp *qp, struct list_head *list, struct ib_mr *mr);
>
> int ib_mr_pool_init(struct ib_qp *qp, struct list_head *list, int nr,
> - enum ib_mr_type type, u32 max_num_sg, u32 max_num_meta_sg);
> + enum ib_mr_type type, u32 max_num_sg, u32 max_num_meta_sg,
> + u32 access);
> void ib_mr_pool_destroy(struct ib_qp *qp, struct list_head *list);
>
> #endif /* _RDMA_MR_POOL_H */
Does the new 'access' argument only control whether or not PCIe relaxed
ordering is enabled? It seems wrong to me to make enabling of PCIe
relaxed ordering configurable. I think this mechanism should be enabled
unconditionally if the HCA supports it.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists