[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210405160406.268132-22-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:04:05 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.11 22/22] block: don't ignore REQ_NOWAIT for direct IO
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit f8b78caf21d5bc3fcfc40c18898f9d52ed1451a5 ]
If IOCB_NOWAIT is set on submission, then that needs to get propagated to
REQ_NOWAIT on the block side. Otherwise we completely lose this
information, and any issuer of IOCB_NOWAIT IO will potentially end up
blocking on eg request allocation on the storage side.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/block_dev.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index c33151020bcd..06b422fa67a4 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -276,6 +276,8 @@ __blkdev_direct_IO_simple(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
bio.bi_opf = dio_bio_write_op(iocb);
task_io_account_write(ret);
}
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
+ bio.bi_opf |= REQ_NOWAIT;
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI)
bio_set_polled(&bio, iocb);
@@ -429,6 +431,8 @@ __blkdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, int nr_pages)
bio->bi_opf = dio_bio_write_op(iocb);
task_io_account_write(bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
}
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
+ bio->bi_opf |= REQ_NOWAIT;
dio->size += bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
pos += bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists