linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] KVM/ARM: Some vgic fixes and init sequence KVM selftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <051db106-791c-46e7-d921-23e2bfb68b7e@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Apr 2021 18:30:58 +0200
From:   Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     eric.auger.pro@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        drjones@...hat.com, alexandru.elisei@....com, james.morse@....com,
        suzuki.poulose@....com, shuah@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] KVM/ARM: Some vgic fixes and init sequence KVM
 selftests

Hi Marc,

On 4/5/21 12:12 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> On Sun, 04 Apr 2021 18:22:35 +0100,
> Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> While writting vgic v3 init sequence KVM selftests I noticed some
>> relatively minor issues. This was also the opportunity to try to
>> fix the issue laterly reported by Zenghui, related to the RDIST_TYPER
>> last bit emulation. The final patch is a first batch of VGIC init
>> sequence selftests. Of course they can be augmented with a lot more
>> register access tests, but let's try to move forward incrementally ...
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> This series can be found at:
>> https://github.com/eauger/linux/tree/vgic_kvmselftests_v5
>>
>> History:
>> v4 -> v5:
>> - rewrite the last bit detection according to Marc's
>>   interpretation of the spec and modify the kvm selftests
>>   accordingly
> 
> Have you dropped v4's patch #1? It did seem to fix an actual issue,
> didn't it?

Hum no that was not my intent :-( Resending ...

Eric
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
>