[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210406162530.GT2531743@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 17:25:30 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/27] mm: Introduce struct folio
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 04:05:50PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 03:55:11PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Assuming we're getting rid of them all though, we have to include:
> >
> > $ git grep 'page->mapping' fs |wc -l
> > 358
> > $ git grep 'page->index' fs |wc -l
> > 355
>
> Are they all going to stay? Or are we going to clean up some of that
> mess. A lot of ->index should be page_offet, and on the mapping side
> the page_mapping and page_file_mapping mess is also waiting to be
> sorted..
About a third of ->index can be folio_offset(), based on a crude:
$ git grep 'page->index.*PAGE_' |wc -l
101
and I absolutely don't mind cleaning that up as part of the folio work,
but that still leaves 200-250 instances that would need to be changed
later.
I don't want to change the page->mapping to calls to folio_mapping().
That's a lot of extra work for a page which the filesystem knows belongs
to it. folio_mapping() only needs to be used for pages which might not
belong to a filesystem.
page_file_mapping() absolutely needs to go away. The way to do that
is to change swap-over-nfs to use direct IO, and then NFS can use
folio->mapping like all other filesystems. f2fs is just terminally
confused and shouldn't be using page_file_mapping at all. I'll fix
that as part of the folio work.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists