lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210406163001.GA1910748@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:30:01 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@...omium.org>,
        Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] dt-bindings: usb: Add binding for Realtek RTS5411
 hub controller

On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 01:18:13PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> The Realtek RTS5411 is a USB 3.0 hub controller with 4 ports.
> 
> This initial version of the binding only describes USB related
> aspects of the RTS5411, it does not cover the option of
> connecting the controller as an i2c slave.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v7:
> - added type ref for 'companion-hub' property
> 
> Changes in v6:
> - Realtek binding instead of generic onboard_usb_hub
> - added 'companion-hub' property
> - added reference to 'usb-device.yaml'
> - 'fixed' indentation of compatible entries to keep yamllint happy
> - added 'additionalProperties' entry
> - updated commit message
> 
> Changes in v5:
> - updated 'title'
> - only use standard USB compatible strings
> - deleted 'usb_hub' node
> - renamed 'usb_controller' node to 'usb-controller'
> - removed labels from USB nodes
> - added 'vdd-supply' to USB nodes
> 
> Changes in v4:
> - none
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - updated commit message
> - removed recursive reference to $self
> - adjusted 'compatible' definition to support multiple entries
> - changed USB controller phandle to be a node
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - removed 'wakeup-source' and 'power-off-in-suspend' properties
> - consistently use spaces for indentation in example
> 
>  .../bindings/usb/realtek,rts5411.yaml         | 59 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/realtek,rts5411.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/realtek,rts5411.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/realtek,rts5411.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b59001972749
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/realtek,rts5411.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/usb/realtek,rts5411.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Binding for the Realtek RTS5411 USB 3.0 hub controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: usb-device.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    items:
> +      - enum:
> +          - usbbda,5411
> +          - usbbda,411
> +

reg: true

to fix the error.

> +  vdd-supply:
> +    description:
> +      phandle to the regulator that provides power to the hub.
> +
> +  companion-hub:
> +    $ref: '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle'
> +    description:
> +      phandle to the companion hub on the controller.

This should be required I think. I suppose you could only hook up 2.0 
ports, but why. And 3.0 only wouldn't be USB compliant, would it?

> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    usb-controller {

'usb' is the standard name.

> +        dr_mode = "host";
> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> +        #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +        /* 2.0 hub on port 1 */
> +        hub_2_0: hub@1 {
> +            compatible = "usbbda,5411";
> +            reg = <1>;
> +            vdd-supply = <&pp3300_hub>;
> +            companion-hub = <&hub_3_0>;
> +        };
> +
> +        /* 3.0 hub on port 2 */
> +        hub_3_0: hub@2 {
> +            compatible = "usbbda,411";
> +            reg = <2>;
> +            vdd-supply = <&pp3300_hub>;
> +            companion-hub = <&hub_2_0>;
> +        };
> +    };
> -- 
> 2.31.0.208.g409f899ff0-goog
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ