linux-kernel - [PATCH v7 2/8] pwm: pca9685: Support hardware readout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210406164140.81423-2-clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
Date:   Tue,  6 Apr 2021 18:41:34 +0200
From:   Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
To:     linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/8] pwm: pca9685: Support hardware readout

Implements .get_state to read-out the current hardware state.

The hardware readout may return slightly different values than those
that were set in apply due to the limited range of possible prescale and
counter register values.

Also note that although the datasheet mentions 200 Hz as default
frequency when using the internal 25 MHz oscillator, the calculated
period from the default prescaler register setting of 30 is 5079040ns.

Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
---
Changes since v6:
- Added a comment regarding the division (Suggested by Uwe)
- Rebased

 drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
index 5a2ce97e71fd..d4474c5ff96f 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
@@ -333,6 +333,51 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void pca9685_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				  struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip);
+	unsigned long long duty;
+	unsigned int val = 0;
+
+	/* Calculate (chip-wide) period from prescale value */
+	regmap_read(pca->regmap, PCA9685_PRESCALE, &val);
+	/*
+	 * PCA9685_OSC_CLOCK_MHZ is 25, i.e. an integer divider of 1000.
+	 * The following calculation is therefore only a multiplication
+	 * and we are not losing precision.
+	 */
+	state->period = (PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE * 1000 / PCA9685_OSC_CLOCK_MHZ) *
+			(val + 1);
+
+	/* The (per-channel) polarity is fixed */
+	state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
+
+	if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN) {
+		/*
+		 * The "all LEDs" channel does not support HW readout
+		 * Return 0 and disabled for backwards compatibility
+		 */
+		state->duty_cycle = 0;
+		state->enabled = false;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	duty = pca9685_pwm_get_duty(pca, pwm->hwpwm);
+
+	state->enabled = !!duty;
+	if (!state->enabled) {
+		state->duty_cycle = 0;
+		return;
+	} else if (duty == PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE) {
+		state->duty_cycle = state->period;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	duty *= state->period;
+	state->duty_cycle = duty / PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE;
+}
+
 static int pca9685_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
 	struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip);
@@ -355,6 +400,7 @@ static void pca9685_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
 
 static const struct pwm_ops pca9685_pwm_ops = {
 	.apply = pca9685_pwm_apply,
+	.get_state = pca9685_pwm_get_state,
 	.request = pca9685_pwm_request,
 	.free = pca9685_pwm_free,
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
-- 
2.31.1