linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v32 0/4] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210406172115.hi7r47la232ou6yg@mpHalley.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 6 Apr 2021 19:21:15 +0200
From:   Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@...sung.com>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
CC:     <daejun7.park@...sung.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
        ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        JinHwan Park <jh.i.park@...sung.com>,
        Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
        Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
        Dukhyun Kwon <d_hyun.kwon@...sung.com>,
        "Keoseong Park" <keosung.park@...sung.com>,
        Jaemyung Lee <jaemyung.lee@...sung.com>,
        Jieon Seol <jieon.seol@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v32 0/4] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

On 31.03.2021 21:40, Bean Huo wrote:
>Hi Martin
>
>I don't know when/how do you plan to accept this patch. I think the
>Mobile vendors and chipset vendors are all looking forward to this UFS
>HPB feature that can be mainlined in the upstream Linux. Since the
>first version HPB driver submitted in the community, it is now V32, and
>we have been working on this feature for two years. Would you please
>take a look at this? thanks.

Hi Bean,

I believe it would help if you and others are willing to review this
patchset thoroughly and give a reviewed-by / tested-by tag. This will
give Martin and others more confidence that there is vendor alignment
and that there is a group of people is willing to maintain HPB going
forward.

What do you think?

Javier