linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kunit-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGS_qxpLOMKCS8QwOQN3ZFY-XO6MvXQOdND0pd6wYXw21CTEYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:32:41 -0700
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardo@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kunit-next tree

Thanks for the catch.
Should be addressed by
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210406172901.1729216-1-dlatypov@google.com/

When I was testing the CONFIG_KUNIT=n case, I added it to a file that
wasn't being compiled (CONFIG_UBSAN=y is not sufficient for
lib/ubsan.c to be compiled...).

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:24 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the kunit-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> In file included from lib/kunit/test.c:10:
> include/kunit/test-bug.h:22:28: warning: '__kunit_fail_current_test' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>    22 | static __printf(3, 4) void __kunit_fail_current_test(const char *file, int line,
>       |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Introduced by commit
>
>   359a376081d4 ("kunit: support failure from dynamic analysis tools")
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell