[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210406221952.50399-1-ahalaney@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 17:19:52 -0500
From: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
To: bigeasy@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>
Subject: [RT PATCH] locking/rwsem-rt: Remove might_sleep() in __up_read()
There's no chance of sleeping here, the reader is giving up the
lock and possibly waking up the writer who is waiting on it.
Reported-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
---
Hello,
I ran into a warning caused by this, and I think the warning is
incorrect. Please let me know if I'm wrong!
I'm working off of linux-5.12.y-rt, but this applies cleanly to older
stable branches as well.
Thanks,
Andrew
kernel/locking/rwsem-rt.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-rt.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-rt.c
index 274172d5bb3a..b61edc4dcb73 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-rt.c
@@ -198,7 +198,6 @@ void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&sem->readers))
return;
- might_sleep();
raw_spin_lock_irq(&m->wait_lock);
/*
* Wake the writer, i.e. the rtmutex owner. It might release the
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists