lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210405220912.b916e5f504cd2c11d7288cb2@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 5 Apr 2021 22:09:12 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc:     jbaron@...mai.com, rpenyaev@...e.de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs/epoll: restore waking from ep_done_scan()

On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:22:26 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Apr 2021, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> >Tricky.  339ddb53d373 was merged in December 2019.  So do we backport
> >this fix?  Could any userspace code be depending upon the
> >post-339ddb53d373 behavior?
> 
> As with previous trouble caused by this commit, I vote for restoring the behavior
> backporting the fix, basically the equivalent of adding (which was my intention):
> 
> Fixes: 339ddb53d373 ("fs/epoll: remove unnecessary wakeups of nested epoll")

OK, I added the Fixes: line and the cc:stable line.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ