[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210405220912.b916e5f504cd2c11d7288cb2@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 22:09:12 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: jbaron@...mai.com, rpenyaev@...e.de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs/epoll: restore waking from ep_done_scan()
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:22:26 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Apr 2021, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >Tricky. 339ddb53d373 was merged in December 2019. So do we backport
> >this fix? Could any userspace code be depending upon the
> >post-339ddb53d373 behavior?
>
> As with previous trouble caused by this commit, I vote for restoring the behavior
> backporting the fix, basically the equivalent of adding (which was my intention):
>
> Fixes: 339ddb53d373 ("fs/epoll: remove unnecessary wakeups of nested epoll")
OK, I added the Fixes: line and the cc:stable line.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists