[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a11edfeed79b8f411dc1948aadae0f25@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 14:26:37 +0800
From: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
Zang Leigang <zangleigang@...ilicon.com>,
Avi Shchislowski <Avi.Shchislowski@....com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>, stanley.chu@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] scsi: ufshpb: Region inactivation in host mode
On 2021-04-06 14:16, Avri Altman wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-04-06 13:20, Avri Altman wrote:
>> >> > -static void __ufshpb_evict_region(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>> >> > - struct ufshpb_region *rgn)
>> >> > +static int __ufshpb_evict_region(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>> >> > + struct ufshpb_region *rgn)
>> >> > {
>> >> > struct victim_select_info *lru_info;
>> >> > struct ufshpb_subregion *srgn;
>> >> > int srgn_idx;
>> >> >
>> >> > + lockdep_assert_held(&hpb->rgn_state_lock);
>> >> > +
>> >> > + if (hpb->is_hcm) {
>> >> > + unsigned long flags;
>> >> > + int ret;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->rgn_state_lock, flags);
>> >>
>> >> Never seen a usage like this... Here flags is used without being
>> >> intialized.
>> >> The flag is needed when spin_unlock_irqrestore ->
>> >> local_irq_restore(flags) to
>> >> restore the DAIF register (in terms of ARM).
>> > OK.
>>
>> Hi Avri,
>>
>> Checked on my setup, this lead to compilation error. Will you fix it
>> in
>> next version?
>>
>> warning: variable 'flags' is uninitialized when used here
>> [-Wuninitialized]
> Yeah - I will pass it to __ufshpb_evict_region and drop the
> lockdep_assert call.
>
Please paste the sample code/change here so that I can move forward
quickly.
> I don't want to block your testing - are there any other things you
> want me to change?
Currently, no. I will try to review and test this series these days and
post comments at once.
Thanks,
Can Guo.
>
> Thanks,
> Avri
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Can Guo.
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Avri
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> Can Guo.
>> >>
>> >> > + ret = ufshpb_issue_umap_single_req(hpb, rgn);
>> >> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&hpb->rgn_state_lock, flags);
>> >> > + if (ret)
>> >> > + return ret;
>> >> > + }
>> >> > +
>> >> > lru_info = &hpb->lru_info;
>> >> >
>> >> > dev_dbg(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev, "evict region %d\n",
>> >> > rgn->rgn_idx);
>> >> > @@ -1130,6 +1150,8 @@ static void __ufshpb_evict_region(struct
>> >> > ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>> >> >
>> >> > for_each_sub_region(rgn, srgn_idx, srgn)
>> >> > ufshpb_purge_active_subregion(hpb, srgn);
>> >> > +
>> >> > + return 0;
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > static int ufshpb_evict_region(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb, struct
>> >> > ufshpb_region *rgn)
>> >> > @@ -1151,7 +1173,7 @@ static int ufshpb_evict_region(struct ufshpb_lu
>> >> > *hpb, struct ufshpb_region *rgn)
>> >> > goto out;
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > - __ufshpb_evict_region(hpb, rgn);
>> >> > + ret = __ufshpb_evict_region(hpb, rgn);
>> >> > }
>> >> > out:
>> >> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->rgn_state_lock, flags);
>> >> > @@ -1285,7 +1307,9 @@ static int ufshpb_add_region(struct ufshpb_lu
>> >> > *hpb, struct ufshpb_region *rgn)
>> >> > "LRU full (%d), choose victim %d\n",
>> >> > atomic_read(&lru_info->active_cnt),
>> >> > victim_rgn->rgn_idx);
>> >> > - __ufshpb_evict_region(hpb, victim_rgn);
>> >> > + ret = __ufshpb_evict_region(hpb, victim_rgn);
>> >> > + if (ret)
>> >> > + goto out;
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > /*
>> >> > @@ -1856,6 +1880,7 @@ ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(rb_noti_cnt);
>> >> > ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(rb_active_cnt);
>> >> > ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(rb_inactive_cnt);
>> >> > ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(map_req_cnt);
>> >> > +ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(umap_req_cnt);
>> >> >
>> >> > static struct attribute *hpb_dev_stat_attrs[] = {
>> >> > &dev_attr_hit_cnt.attr,
>> >> > @@ -1864,6 +1889,7 @@ static struct attribute *hpb_dev_stat_attrs[] = {
>> >> > &dev_attr_rb_active_cnt.attr,
>> >> > &dev_attr_rb_inactive_cnt.attr,
>> >> > &dev_attr_map_req_cnt.attr,
>> >> > + &dev_attr_umap_req_cnt.attr,
>> >> > NULL,
>> >> > };
>> >> >
>> >> > @@ -1988,6 +2014,7 @@ static void ufshpb_stat_init(struct ufshpb_lu
>> >> > *hpb)
>> >> > hpb->stats.rb_active_cnt = 0;
>> >> > hpb->stats.rb_inactive_cnt = 0;
>> >> > hpb->stats.map_req_cnt = 0;
>> >> > + hpb->stats.umap_req_cnt = 0;
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > static void ufshpb_param_init(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>> >> > index 87495e59fcf1..1ea58c17a4de 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>> >> > @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ struct ufshpb_stats {
>> >> > u64 rb_inactive_cnt;
>> >> > u64 map_req_cnt;
>> >> > u64 pre_req_cnt;
>> >> > + u64 umap_req_cnt;
>> >> > };
>> >> >
>> >> > struct ufshpb_lu {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists