linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH rdma-next 02/10] RDMA/core: Enable Relaxed Ordering in __ib_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YGv/nne+E5xXHsME@unreal>
Date:   Tue, 6 Apr 2021 09:28:46 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Avihai Horon <avihaih@...dia.com>,
        Adit Ranadive <aditr@...are.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Bernard Metzler <bmt@...ich.ibm.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
        Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@...adcom.com>,
        Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
        Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...os.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Lijun Ou <oulijun@...wei.com>,
        linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>,
        "Md. Haris Iqbal" <haris.iqbal@...os.com>,
        Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@...dia.com>,
        Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@...vell.com>,
        Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>,
        Naresh Kumar PBS <nareshkumar.pbs@...adcom.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@...lsio.com>,
        rds-devel@....oracle.com, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
        Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
        Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>,
        Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
        Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>,
        Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>,
        Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        VMware PV-Drivers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
        Weihang Li <liweihang@...wei.com>,
        Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
        Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 02/10] RDMA/core: Enable Relaxed Ordering in
 __ib_alloc_pd()

On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 02:01:16PM -0400, Tom Talpey wrote:
> On 4/5/2021 1:23 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Avihai Horon <avihaih@...dia.com>
> > 
> > Enable Relaxed Ordering in __ib_alloc_pd() allocation of the
> > local_dma_lkey.
> > 
> > This will take effect only for devices that don't pre-allocate the lkey
> > but allocate it per PD allocation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Avihai Horon <avihaih@...dia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@...dia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c              | 3 ++-
> >   drivers/infiniband/hw/vmw_pvrdma/pvrdma_mr.c | 1 +
> >   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
> > index a1782f8a6ca0..9b719f7d6fd5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
> > @@ -287,7 +287,8 @@ struct ib_pd *__ib_alloc_pd(struct ib_device *device, unsigned int flags,
> >   	if (device->attrs.device_cap_flags & IB_DEVICE_LOCAL_DMA_LKEY)
> >   		pd->local_dma_lkey = device->local_dma_lkey;
> >   	else
> > -		mr_access_flags |= IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE;
> > +		mr_access_flags |=
> > +			IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING;
> 
> So, do local_dma_lkey's get relaxed ordering unconditionally?

Yes, in mlx5, this lkey is created on the fly.

Thanks