[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2104060311490.65251@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 03:22:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To: Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>
cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Wei Li <liwei391@...wei.com>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: add support for buggy MT7621S core detection
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021, Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/bugs.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/bugs.h
> index d72dc6e1cf3c..d32f0c4e61f7 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/bugs.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/bugs.h
> @@ -50,4 +51,21 @@ static inline int r4k_daddiu_bug(void)
> return daddiu_bug != 0;
> }
>
> +static inline void cm_gcr_pcores_bug(unsigned int *ncores)
> +{
> + struct cpulaunch *launch;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SOC_MT7621) || !ncores)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * Ralink MT7621S SoC is single core, but GCR_CONFIG always reports 2 cores.
Overlong line.
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/smp-cps.c b/arch/mips/kernel/smp-cps.c
> index bcd6a944b839..e1e9c11e8a7c 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/smp-cps.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/smp-cps.c
> @@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ static void __init cps_smp_setup(void)
> pr_cont("{");
>
> ncores = mips_cps_numcores(cl);
> + cm_gcr_pcores_bug(&ncores);
> for (c = 0; c < ncores; c++) {
> core_vpes = core_vpe_count(cl, c);
>
> @@ -170,6 +172,7 @@ static void __init cps_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>
> /* Allocate core boot configuration structs */
> ncores = mips_cps_numcores(0);
> + cm_gcr_pcores_bug(&ncores);
Why called at each `mips_cps_numcores' call site rather than within the
callee? Also weird inefficient interface: why isn't `ncores' passed by
value for a new value to be returned?
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists