linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] usb: typec: tcpm: update power supply once partner accepts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <83eeff38-c990-2797-e950-b3466cdd2ff6@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 5 Apr 2021 18:57:34 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
Cc:     linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Kyle Tso <kyletso@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] usb: typec: tcpm: update power supply once partner
 accepts

On 4/5/21 6:36 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> power_supply_changed needs to be called to notify clients
> after the partner accepts the requested values for the pps
> case.
> 
> Fixes: f2a8aa053c176 ("typec: tcpm: Represent source supply through power_supply")
> Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> index d43774cc2ccf..7708b01009cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> @@ -2564,6 +2564,7 @@ static void tcpm_pd_ctrl_request(struct tcpm_port *port,
>  			port->pps_data.max_curr = port->pps_data.req_max_curr;
>  			port->req_supply_voltage = port->pps_data.req_out_volt;
>  			port->req_current_limit = port->pps_data.req_op_curr;
> +			power_supply_changed(port->psy);
>  			tcpm_set_state(port, SNK_TRANSITION_SINK, 0);
>  			break;
>  		case SOFT_RESET_SEND:
> @@ -3132,7 +3133,6 @@ static unsigned int tcpm_pd_select_pps_apdo(struct tcpm_port *port)
>  						      port->pps_data.req_out_volt));
>  		port->pps_data.req_op_curr = min(port->pps_data.max_curr,
>  						 port->pps_data.req_op_curr);
> -		power_supply_changed(port->psy);
>  	}
>  
>  	return src_pdo;
> @@ -3557,8 +3557,6 @@ static void tcpm_reset_port(struct tcpm_port *port)
>  	port->sink_cap_done = false;
>  	if (port->tcpc->enable_frs)
>  		port->tcpc->enable_frs(port->tcpc, false);
> -
> -	power_supply_changed(port->psy);

The reason for this change is missing in the patch description,
or am I missing something ?

Thanks,
Guenter

>  }
>  
>  static void tcpm_detach(struct tcpm_port *port)
>