| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YGxxmkktS4cQjx+z@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 17:35:06 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
George Kennedy <george.kennedy@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
lkp@...el.com
Subject: Re: [ACPI] 1a1c130ab7: BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:55:28PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9):
>
> commit: 1a1c130ab7575498eed5bcf7220037ae09cd1f8a ("ACPI: tables: x86: Reserve memory occupied by ACPI tables")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
>
> in testcase: trinity
> version: trinity-i386-4d2343bd-1_20200320
> with following parameters:
>
> number: 99999
> group: group-00
>
> test-description: Trinity is a linux system call fuzz tester.
> test-url: http://codemonkey.org.uk/projects/trinity/
>
>
> on test machine: qemu-system-i386 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 16G
>
> caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
>
>
> +---------------------------------------------------------+-----------+------------+
> | | v5.12-rc5 | 1a1c130ab7 |
> +---------------------------------------------------------+-----------+------------+
> | boot_successes | 16 | 0 |
> | BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address | 0 | 24 |
> | Oops:#[##] | 0 | 24 |
> | EIP:get_pfnblock_flags_mask | 0 | 24 |
> | Kernel_panic-not_syncing:Fatal_exception | 0 | 24 |
> +---------------------------------------------------------+-----------+------------+
>
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
>
>
> [ 0.136065] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000004
> [ 0.136596] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 0.137003] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 0.137431] *pde = 00000000
> [ 0.137671] Oops: 0000 [#1]
> [ 0.137908] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.12.0-rc5-00001-g1a1c130ab757 #2
> [ 0.138567] EIP: get_pfnblock_flags_mask (kbuild/src/consumer/mm/page_alloc.c:490 kbuild/src/consumer/mm/page_alloc.c:504)
> [ 0.138971] Code: 55 89 e5 83 ec 08 89 5d f8 89 cb 89 d1 89 75 fc c1 ea 0e c1 e2 04 8b 82 84 77 95 c2 c1 e9 08 83 e1 3c 89 ce 83 e1 1f c1 ee 05 <8b> 04 b0 8b 75 fc d3 e8 21 d8 8b 5d f8 89 ec 5d c3 e8 27 dc e4 ff
> [ 0.140504] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000007 ECX: 0000001c EDX: 003faaa0
> [ 0.141025] ESI: 00000001 EDI: ffffffff EBP: c1c29e18 ESP: c1c29e10
> [ 0.141544] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00210003
> [ 0.142096] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00000004 CR3: 02226000 CR4: 00040690
> [ 0.142620] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
> [ 0.143146] DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000400
> [ 0.143473] Call Trace:
> [ 0.143698] __dump_page (kbuild/src/consumer/mm/debug.c:66)
> [ 0.143984] ? find_held_lock (kbuild/src/consumer/kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5003)
> [ 0.144300] ? _raw_spin_unlock (kbuild/src/consumer/kernel/locking/spinlock.c:184)
> [ 0.144633] ? console_unlock (kbuild/src/consumer/kernel/printk/printk.c:2561)
> [ 0.144960] ? __next_mem_range_rev (kbuild/src/consumer/mm/memblock.c:1106)
> [ 0.145339] ? memblock_insert_region+0x2a/0x45
> [ 0.145762] ? memblock_add_range+0x12d/0x137
> [ 0.146242] ? memblock_reserve (kbuild/src/consumer/mm/memblock.c:818 (discriminator 3))
> [ 0.146570] ? should_skip_region (kbuild/src/consumer/mm/memblock.c:935)
> [ 0.146905] ? __next_mem_range (kbuild/src/consumer/mm/memblock.c:1002)
> [ 0.147245] dump_page (kbuild/src/consumer/arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:25 kbuild/src/consumer/include/linux/page_owner.h:51 kbuild/src/consumer/mm/debug.c:193)
> [ 0.147536] reserve_bootmem_region (kbuild/src/consumer/include/linux/page-flags.h:356 kbuild/src/consumer/mm/page_alloc.c:1528)
> [ 0.147953] memblock_free_all (kbuild/src/consumer/mm/memblock.c:2013 kbuild/src/consumer/mm/memblock.c:2061)
> [ 0.148376] ? memblock_alloc_try_nid (kbuild/src/consumer/mm/memblock.c:1567 (discriminator 3))
> [ 0.148857] mem_init (kbuild/src/consumer/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c:756)
> [ 0.149119] start_kernel (kbuild/src/consumer/init/main.c:835 kbuild/src/consumer/init/main.c:908)
> [ 0.149421] i386_start_kernel (kbuild/src/consumer/arch/x86/kernel/head32.c:57)
> [ 0.149744] startup_32_smp (kbuild/src/consumer/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S:328)
> [ 0.150071] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.150330] CR2: 0000000000000004
> [ 0.150589] random: get_random_bytes called from print_oops_end_marker+0x2f/0x50 with crng_init=0
> [ 0.150596] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> [ 0.151694] EIP: get_pfnblock_flags_mask (kbuild/src/consumer/mm/page_alloc.c:490 kbuild/src/consumer/mm/page_alloc.c:504)
> [ 0.152069] Code: 55 89 e5 83 ec 08 89 5d f8 89 cb 89 d1 89 75 fc c1 ea 0e c1 e2 04 8b 82 84 77 95 c2 c1 e9 08 83 e1 3c 89 ce 83 e1 1f c1 ee 05 <8b> 04 b0 8b 75 fc d3 e8 21 d8 8b 5d f8 89 ec 5d c3 e8 27 dc e4 ff
We hit PF_POISONED_CHECK(page) at __SetPageReserved() called from
reserve_bootmem_region().
The machine has 16G of ram, but it runs 32bit kernel with no HIGHMEM, so it
has max_pfn trimmed in highmem_pfn_init(), but the rest of the memory
representation (neither e820 tables nor memblock) are never updated:
[ 0.006005] Warning only 495MB will be used.
[ 0.006328] Use a HIGHMEM enabled kernel.
So when we get to sparse_init() the sections above 495M are initialized and
pfns in that range are considered valid by the rest of the system.
I believe something along the lines of the patch below should fix this:
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
index da31c2635ee4..a41a64314ce2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
@@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void __init lowmem_pfn_init(void)
*/
static void __init highmem_pfn_init(void)
{
+ unsigned long orig_max_pfn = max_pfn;
max_low_pfn = MAXMEM_PFN;
if (highmem_pages == -1)
@@ -636,6 +637,13 @@ static void __init highmem_pfn_init(void)
}
#endif /* !CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G */
#endif /* !CONFIG_HIGHMEM */
+
+ if (orig_max_pfn > max_pfn) {
+ u64 start = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn);
+ u64 size = ULLONG_MAX - size;
+
+ e820__range_remove(start, size, E820_TYPE_RAM, 1);
+ }
}
/*
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists