[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210406145511.GS2531743@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 15:55:11 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/27] mm: Introduce struct folio
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 03:40:22PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 03:31:50PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > > As Christoph, I'm not a fan of this :/
> > > >
> > > > What would you prefer?
> > >
> > > Looking at your full folio series on git.infradead.org, there are a
> > > total of 12 references to non-page members of struct folio, assuming
> > > my crude grep that expects a folio to be named folio did not miss any.
> >
> > Hmm ... I count more in the filesystems:
>
> I only counted the ones that you actually did convert.
>
> This add about 80 more. IMHO still not worth doing the union. I'd
> rather sort this out properl if/when the structures get properly split.
Assuming we're getting rid of them all though, we have to include:
$ git grep 'page->mapping' fs |wc -l
358
$ git grep 'page->index' fs |wc -l
355
Powered by blists - more mailing lists