[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B67E76D-139B-4004-9DE0-A626026CAEB1@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 15:46:34 +0000
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Huang Guobin <huangguobin4@...wei.com>,
Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>
CC: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] NFSD: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
> On Apr 6, 2021, at 8:08 AM, Huang Guobin <huangguobin4@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> From: Guobin Huang <huangguobin4@...wei.com>
>
> spinlock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_SPINLOCK()
> rather than explicitly calling spin_lock_init().
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guobin Huang <huangguobin4@...wei.com>
This same patch was sent last July, without the Reported-by:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/1617710898-49064-1-git-send-email-huangguobin4@huawei.com/T/#u
If I'm reading the code correctly, it appears that set_max_drc()
can be called more than once by user space API functions via
nfsd_create_serv().
It seems to me we want to guarantee that nfsd_drc_lock is
initialized exactly once, and using DEFINE_SPINLOCK() would
do just that.
Likewise, re-initializing nfsd_drc_mem_used is probably not good
to do either, but clobbering a spinlock like that might lead to
a crash.
Bruce, any further thoughts?
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> index b2eef4112bc2..82ba034fa579 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ DEFINE_MUTEX(nfsd_mutex);
> * version 4.1 DRC caches.
> * nfsd_drc_pages_used tracks the current version 4.1 DRC memory usage.
> */
> -spinlock_t nfsd_drc_lock;
> +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nfsd_drc_lock);
> unsigned long nfsd_drc_max_mem;
> unsigned long nfsd_drc_mem_used;
>
> @@ -563,7 +563,6 @@ static void set_max_drc(void)
> nfsd_drc_max_mem = (nr_free_buffer_pages()
> >> NFSD_DRC_SIZE_SHIFT) * PAGE_SIZE;
> nfsd_drc_mem_used = 0;
> - spin_lock_init(&nfsd_drc_lock);
> dprintk("%s nfsd_drc_max_mem %lu \n", __func__, nfsd_drc_max_mem);
> }
>
>
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists