lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 7 Apr 2021 21:40:58 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     Al Grant <Al.Grant@....com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        James Clark <James.Clark@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] perf arm-spe: Enable timestamp

On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:28:40PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 7/04/21 4:15 pm, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Hi Al,
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 09:38:32AM +0000, Al Grant wrote:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> >>> This patch set is to enable timestamp for Arm SPE trace.  It reads out TSC
> >>> parameters from mmap page and stores into auxtrace info structure;
> >>
> >> Why not synthesize a PERF_RECORD_TIME_CONV - isn't that specifically to
> >> capture the TSC parameters from the mmap page? If a generic mechanism
> >> exists it would be better to use it, otherwise we'll have to do this again for
> >> future trace formats.
> > 
> > Good point!  Actually "perf record" tool has synthesized event
> > PERF_RECORD_TIME_CONV.  This patch series is studying the
> > implementation from Intel-PT, so the question is why the existed
> > implementations (like Intel-PT, Intel-BTS) don't directly use
> > PERF_RECORD_TIME_CONV for retriving TSC parameters.
> 
> PERF_RECORD_TIME_CONV was added later because the TSC information is
> needed by jitdump.

Thanks for the info, Adrian.

If so, it's good for Arm SPE to use PERF_RECORD_TIME_CONV for TSC
parameters.  Will spin patch series for this.

Leo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ