[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210407023944.GZ2531743@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 03:39:44 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Michel Lespinasse <michel@...pinasse.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...gle.com>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 29/37] fs: list file types that support speculative
faults.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 06:44:54PM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> Add a speculative field to the vm_operations_struct, which indicates if
> the associated file type supports speculative faults.
>
> Initially this is set for files that implement fault() with filemap_fault().
Ugh, no. This goes away if you don't call ->fault speculatively.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists