linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: serial: 8250: deprecate aspeed,sirq-polarity-sense

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YG3kJC+6gLC6RzzQ@hatter.bewilderbeest.net>
Date:   Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:56:04 -0500
From:   Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
        - <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: serial: 8250: deprecate
 aspeed,sirq-polarity-sense

On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:18:31AM CDT, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 01:27:21PM -0500, Zev Weiss wrote:
>> This property ties SIRQ polarity to SCU register bits that don't
>> necessarily have any direct relationship to it; the only use of it
>> was removed in commit c82bf6e133d30e0f9172a20807814fa28aef0f67.
>
>Please write that as:
>	c82bf6e133d3 ("ARM: aspeed: g5: Do not set sirq polarity")
>

Ack, will do.

>> Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
>> Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.yaml | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>What changed from previous versions?  That always goes below the ---
>line.
>

I included an overview of that in the cover letter 
(https://lore.kernel.org/openbmc/20210402182724.20848-1-zev@bewilderbeest.net/); 
is it desirable to also have that duplicated in the individual patches 
in the series?


Zev
Zev