[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb7e62506bdf19a94ba4f837c5189db676a632c6.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 10:17:48 -0700
From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@...il.com>,
"Box, David E" <david.e.box@...el.com>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mashiah, Tamar" <tamar.mashiah@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: export platform
global_reset via sysfs.
On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 09:31 +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 4/7/21 8:51 AM, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > During PCH (platform/board) manufacturing process a global
> > > > > reset has
> > > > > to be induced in order for configuration changes take the
> > > > > effect
> > > > > upon following platform reset.
> > > > > This setting was commonly done by accessing PMC registers via
> > > > > /dev/mem but due to security concern /dev/mem access is much
> > > > > restricted, hence the reason for exposing this setting via
> > > > > dedicated sysfs
> > interface.
> > > > > To prevent post manufacturing abuse the register is protected
> > > > > by
> > > > > hardware locking.
> > > >
> > > > The purpose of this reset functionality is not entirely clear
> > > > to me.
> > > >
> > > > Is this only used during production of a board? Or is this also
> > > > something which a user/reseller may use as part of a factory-
> > > > reset
> > procedure?
> > >
> > > Board production and refurbishing of the board. I can try to
> > > rephrase but I
> > thought all the info is in the commit message.
> > > As a runtime feature a user can check that her/his platform is
> > > correctly
> > sealed.
> >
> > Manufacturing is clear, refurbishing is very much not clear, do you
> > mean
> > actually desoldering the chip and replacing it with a new one ?
> >
> > > > If this is only used once during production, then I'm not sure
> > > > if
> > > > introducing a sysfs file for this is desirable.
> > >
> > > What do you suggest, than? I'm just guessing is where are you
> > > heading
> > > so the answer is that the manufacturing is often already run on
> > > the
> > production OS installation, w/o going into details swapping or
> > reconfiguring
> > the OS is not always an option.
> > > The manufacturer is also a user of ours.
> >
> > Ok, so lets compromise here, please make use of the visibility
> > sysfs attribute
> > callback, which returns a umask and make the file read-only at the
> > umask
> > level if it has been sealed, to make it clear to users that they
> > cannot write to
> > it, the -EACCES error means 'Permission denied' so if the user is
> > already root
> > they are going to get mightily confused if ls -l shows the file is
> > writable.
> Okay, it seems a better solution if the file is the global reset,
> but maybe this path should not be taken if we rename it to
> extended_test_mode_register3, than it's better to get EACCESS on a
> specific bit.
> >
> > Also on set you are checking that the written value is bit 20, and
> > on show you
> > are showing the contents of the "Extended Test Mode Register 3" in
> > hex, or
> > at least those bits you are willing to show.
>
> The intention was to left the user space behave same as with direct
> register access (/dev/mem)
>
> > So in essence what you are doing here is giving userspace (some)
> > access to
> > the "Extended Test Mode Register 3", I would prefer to spell that
> > out
> > explicitly. The global_reset sysfs file name to me too much hints
> > at something
> > which the user can trigger / use while it is not intended for user
> > usage.
>
> Yeah, Global reset is maybe too ambiguous name in a general context,
> this is not the standard platform reset.
>
> I've left it in register form in order to keep the user space as it
> has access to the register (/dev/mem)
> >
> > Also the Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-intel-pm file
> > pretty much
> > describes this as direct register access rather then as some reset
> > mechanism.
> >
> > So I think it would be better to call the new file
> > extended_test_mode_register3, this will also be useful if we need
> > to provide
> > access to other bits in the same register later; and this will be a
> > good
> > template to follow if we need to provide some access to other
> > registers later
> > too.
>
> Need to sync with David on that he pointed just ow, that he plans to
> expose some more bits.
I just need the offset to read the register. The bits I'm working with
will not be exposed directly. I'm okay with the name change as long as
usage remains restricted to the CF9 bits in this patch.
David
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hans
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Can you please provide a new version where the purpsoe of the
> > > > newly
> > > > introduced sysfs file is made more clear, both in the commit-
> > > > msg as
> > > > well as in
> > > > the:
> > > Okay I can do that.
> > > >
> > > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-intel-pmc
> > > >
> > > > File ?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Hans
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The register in MMIO space is defined for Cannon Lake and
> > > > > newer PCHs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: David E Box <david.e.box@...el.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <
> > > > > andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Tamar Mashiah <tamar.mashiah@...el.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 2:
> > > > > 1. Add locking for reading the ET3 register (Andy) 2. Fix
> > > > > few style
> > > > > issues (Andy)
> > > > > V3:
> > > > > 1. Resend
> > > > > v4:
> > > > > 1. Fix return statement (Andy)
> > > > > 2. Specify manufacturing process (Enrico)
> > > > >
> > > > > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-intel-pmc | 11 +++
> > > > > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > > > > drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c | 97
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.h | 6 ++
> > > > > 4 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
> > > > > create mode 100644
> > > > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-intel-pmc
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-intel-
> > > > > pmc
> > > > > b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-intel-pmc
> > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > index 000000000000..7ce00e77fbcd
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-intel-pmc
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> > > > > +What: /sys/devices/platform/<platform>/global_reset
> > > > > +Date: Apr 2021
> > > > > +KernelVersion: 5.13
> > > > > +Contact: "Tomas Winkler" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> > > > > +Description:
> > > > > + Display global reset setting bits for PMC.
> > > > > + * bit 31 - global reset is locked
> > > > > + * bit 20 - global reset is set
> > > > > + Writing bit 20 value to the global_reset will
> > > > > induce
> > > > > + a platform global reset upon consequent
> > > > > platform reset.
> > > > > + in case the register is not locked.
> > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index
> > > > > 04f68e0cda64..618676eba8c8 100644
> > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > @@ -9166,6 +9166,7 @@ M: Rajneesh Bhardwaj
> > > > <irenic.rajneesh@...il.com>
> > > > > M: David E Box <david.e.box@...el.com>
> > > > > L: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
> > > > > S: Maintained
> > > > > +F: Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-intel-pmc
> > > > > F: drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core*
> > > > >
> > > > > INTEL PMIC GPIO DRIVERS
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> > > > > b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> > > > > index ee2f757515b0..8afc198550a4 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> > > > > @@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ static const struct pmc_reg_map
> > > > > cnp_reg_map =
> > {
> > > > > .pm_cfg_offset = CNP_PMC_PM_CFG_OFFSET,
> > > > > .pm_read_disable_bit = CNP_PMC_READ_DISABLE_BIT,
> > > > > .ltr_ignore_max = CNP_NUM_IP_IGN_ALLOWED,
> > > > > + .etr3_offset = ETR3_OFFSET,
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > static const struct pmc_reg_map icl_reg_map = { @@ -418,6
> > > > > +419,7 @@
> > > > > static const struct pmc_reg_map icl_reg_map = {
> > > > > .pm_cfg_offset = CNP_PMC_PM_CFG_OFFSET,
> > > > > .pm_read_disable_bit = CNP_PMC_READ_DISABLE_BIT,
> > > > > .ltr_ignore_max = ICL_NUM_IP_IGN_ALLOWED,
> > > > > + .etr3_offset = ETR3_OFFSET,
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > static const struct pmc_bit_map tgl_clocksource_status_map[]
> > > > > = { @@
> > > > > -585,6 +587,7 @@ static const struct pmc_reg_map tgl_reg_map
> > > > > = {
> > > > > .lpm_sts = tgl_lpm_maps,
> > > > > .lpm_status_offset = TGL_LPM_STATUS_OFFSET,
> > > > > .lpm_live_status_offset = TGL_LPM_LIVE_STATUS_OFFSET,
> > > > > + .etr3_offset = ETR3_OFFSET,
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > static inline u32 pmc_core_reg_read(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev,
> > > > > int
> > > > > reg_offset) @@ -603,6 +606,99 @@ static inline u64
> > > > pmc_core_adjust_slp_s0_step(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, u32 value)
> > > > > return (u64)value * pmcdev->map-
> > > > > >slp_s0_res_counter_step;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > +static int set_global_reset(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev) {
> > > > > + const struct pmc_reg_map *map = pmcdev->map;
> > > > > + u32 reg;
> > > > > + int err;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (!map->etr3_offset)
> > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + mutex_lock(&pmcdev->lock);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* check if CF9 is locked */
> > > > > + reg = pmc_core_reg_read(pmcdev, map->etr3_offset);
> > > > > + if (reg & ETR3_CF9LOCK) {
> > > > > + err = -EACCES;
> > > > > + goto out_unlock;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* write CF9 global reset bit */
> > > > > + reg |= ETR3_CF9GR;
> > > > > + pmc_core_reg_write(pmcdev, map->etr3_offset, reg);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + reg = pmc_core_reg_read(pmcdev, map->etr3_offset);
> > > > > + if (!(reg & ETR3_CF9GR)) {
> > > > > + err = -EIO;
> > > > > + goto out_unlock;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + err = 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +out_unlock:
> > > > > + mutex_unlock(&pmcdev->lock);
> > > > > + return err;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static ssize_t global_reset_show(struct device *dev,
> > > > > + struct device_attribute
> > > > > *attr, char *buf) {
> > > > > + struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > > + const struct pmc_reg_map *map = pmcdev->map;
> > > > > + u32 reg;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (!map->etr3_offset)
> > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + mutex_lock(&pmcdev->lock);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + reg = pmc_core_reg_read(pmcdev, map->etr3_offset);
> > > > > + reg &= ETR3_CF9GR | ETR3_CF9LOCK;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + mutex_unlock(&pmcdev->lock);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%08x", reg); }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static ssize_t global_reset_store(struct device *dev,
> > > > > + struct device_attribute
> > > > > *attr,
> > > > > + const char *buf, size_t
> > > > > len)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > > + int err;
> > > > > + u32 reg;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + err = kstrtouint(buf, 16, ®);
> > > > > + if (err)
> > > > > + return err;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* allow only CF9 writes */
> > > > > + if (reg != ETR3_CF9GR)
> > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + err = set_global_reset(pmcdev);
> > > > > + if (err)
> > > > > + return err;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return len;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(global_reset);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static struct attribute *pmc_attrs[] = {
> > > > > + &dev_attr_global_reset.attr,
> > > > > + NULL
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static const struct attribute_group pmc_attr_group = {
> > > > > + .attrs = pmc_attrs,
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static const struct attribute_group *pmc_dev_groups[] = {
> > > > > + &pmc_attr_group,
> > > > > + NULL
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > static int pmc_core_dev_state_get(void *data, u64 *val) {
> > > > > struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = data;
> > > > > @@ -1364,6 +1460,7 @@ static struct platform_driver
> > > > > pmc_core_driver
> > = {
> > > > > .name = "intel_pmc_core",
> > > > > .acpi_match_table =
> > > > > ACPI_PTR(pmc_core_acpi_ids),
> > > > > .pm = &pmc_core_pm_ops,
> > > > > + .dev_groups = pmc_dev_groups,
> > > > > },
> > > > > .probe = pmc_core_probe,
> > > > > .remove = pmc_core_remove,
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.h
> > > > > b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.h
> > > > > index f33cd2c34835..98ebdfe57138 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.h
> > > > > @@ -200,6 +200,11 @@ enum ppfear_regs {
> > > > > #define TGL_LPM_STATUS_OFFSET 0x1C3C
> > > > > #define TGL_LPM_LIVE_STATUS_OFFSET 0x1C5C
> > > > >
> > > > > +/* Extended Test Mode Register 3 (CNL and later) */
> > > > > +#define ETR3_OFFSET 0x1048
> > > > > +#define ETR3_CF9GR BIT(20)
> > > > > +#define ETR3_CF9LOCK BIT(31)
> > > > > +
> > > > > const char *tgl_lpm_modes[] = {
> > > > > "S0i2.0",
> > > > > "S0i2.1",
> > > > > @@ -263,6 +268,7 @@ struct pmc_reg_map {
> > > > > const u32 lpm_residency_offset;
> > > > > const u32 lpm_status_offset;
> > > > > const u32 lpm_live_status_offset;
> > > > > + const u32 etr3_offset;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > /**
> > > > >
> > >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists