| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YG4IZhfYiE+2tyw7@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:30:46 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: improve --stdio mode
Em Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:24:00AM +0100, Martin Liška escreveu:
> On 2/23/21 8:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 01:46:36PM +0100, Martin Liška escreveu:
> > > The patch changes the output format in 2 ways:
> > > - line number is displayed for all source lines (matching TUI mode)
> >
> > Are you aware of 'perf annotate --stdio2' ? If the goal is to make the
> > stdio mode better, doing it in that mode would be best, as it was done
> > to share as much code as possible, not just the looks, with the TUI
> > mode.
>
> Yes, I'm aware of it. My motivation is to generate a HTML perf annotate report
> and I see the following parts of --stdio2 not ideal:
>
> - coloring is not available (--stdio-color=always does not work)
> - 'Sorted summary for file ' is missing so one can't easily search for
> hot spots in browser
> - source line number are displayed, but not the source files
> - there's a missing option for 'Toggle disassembler output/simplified view' which
> is available in TUI mode
>
> That said, the stdio2 annotation report is quite different and so handy for my use case.
I'll add these to my TODO list, all valid concerns. And being able to
directly generate some sort of HTML with CSS, etc also seems a great
feature to have.
- Arnaldo
> >
> > I kept --stdio around because changing the output in that way could
> > annoy people used to that format.
>
> Sure. But I think the current format provides quite broken visual layout:
>
> 0.00 : 405ef1: inc %r15
> 0.01 : 405ef4: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b3(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b0>
> eff.c:1811 0.67 : 405efd: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b2(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b8>
> : TA + tmpsd * (TB +
>
> vs.
>
> 0.00 : 405ef1: inc %r15
> 0.01 : 405ef4: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b3(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b0>
> 0.67 : 405efd: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b2(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b8> // eff.c:1811
> : 1810 TA + tmpsd * (TB +
>
> I bet also the current users of --stdio mode would benefit from it.
> What do you think?
Agreed, I tried applying but it bitrotted, it seems :-\
- Arnaldo
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
> >
> > Please take a look at 'man perf-config' and see what can be configured
> > for both 'perf annotate --tui' and 'perf annotate --stdio2'.
> >
> > Perhaps we can do something like:
> >
> > perf config annotate.stdio=tui_like
> >
> > And, for completeness have:
> >
> > perf config annotate.stdio=classical
> >
> > wdyt?
> >
> > Looking at the other patches now.
> >
> > - Arnaldo
> >
> > > - source locations for the hottest lines are printed
> > > at the line end in order to preserve layout
> > >
> > > Before:
> > >
> > > 0.00 : 405ef1: inc %r15
> > > : tmpsd * (TD + tmpsd * TDD)));
> > > 0.01 : 405ef4: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b3(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b0>
> > > : tmpsd * (TC +
> > > eff.c:1811 0.67 : 405efd: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b2(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b8>
> > > : TA + tmpsd * (TB +
> > > 0.35 : 405f06: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b1(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318c0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8c0>
> > > : dumbo =
> > > eff.c:1809 1.41 : 405f0f: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b0(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318c8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8c8>
> > > : sumi -= sj * tmpsd * dij2i * dumbo;
> > > eff.c:1813 2.58 : 405f18: vmulsd %xmm3,%xmm0,%xmm0
> > > 2.81 : 405f1c: vfnmadd213sd 0x30(%rsp),%xmm1,%xmm0
> > > 3.78 : 405f23: vmovsd %xmm0,0x30(%rsp)
> > > : for (k = 0; k < lpears[i] + upears[i]; k++) {
> > > eff.c:1761 0.90 : 405f29: cmp %r15d,%r12d
> > >
> > > After:
> > >
> > > 0.00 : 405ef1: inc %r15
> > > : 1812 tmpsd * (TD + tmpsd * TDD)));
> > > 0.01 : 405ef4: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b3(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b0>
> > > : 1811 tmpsd * (TC +
> > > 0.67 : 405efd: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b2(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b8> // eff.c:1811
> > > : 1810 TA + tmpsd * (TB +
> > > 0.35 : 405f06: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b1(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318c0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8c0>
> > > : 1809 dumbo =
> > > 1.41 : 405f0f: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b0(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318c8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8c8> // eff.c:1809
> > > : 1813 sumi -= sj * tmpsd * dij2i * dumbo;
> > > 2.58 : 405f18: vmulsd %xmm3,%xmm0,%xmm0 // eff.c:1813
> > > 2.81 : 405f1c: vfnmadd213sd 0x30(%rsp),%xmm1,%xmm0
> > > 3.78 : 405f23: vmovsd %xmm0,0x30(%rsp)
> > > : 1761 for (k = 0; k < lpears[i] + upears[i]; k++) {
> > >
> > > Where e.g. '// eff.c:1811' shares the same color as the percentantage
> > > at the line beginning.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 30 ++++++++++++++----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > > index e60841b86d27..80542012ec1b 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > > @@ -1366,7 +1366,6 @@ annotation_line__print(struct annotation_line *al, struct symbol *sym, u64 start
> > > {
> > > struct disasm_line *dl = container_of(al, struct disasm_line, al);
> > > static const char *prev_line;
> > > - static const char *prev_color;
> > > if (al->offset != -1) {
> > > double max_percent = 0.0;
> > > @@ -1405,20 +1404,6 @@ annotation_line__print(struct annotation_line *al, struct symbol *sym, u64 start
> > > color = get_percent_color(max_percent);
> > > - /*
> > > - * Also color the filename and line if needed, with
> > > - * the same color than the percentage. Don't print it
> > > - * twice for close colored addr with the same filename:line
> > > - */
> > > - if (al->path) {
> > > - if (!prev_line || strcmp(prev_line, al->path)
> > > - || color != prev_color) {
> > > - color_fprintf(stdout, color, " %s", al->path);
> > > - prev_line = al->path;
> > > - prev_color = color;
> > > - }
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > for (i = 0; i < nr_percent; i++) {
> > > struct annotation_data *data = &al->data[i];
> > > double percent;
> > > @@ -1439,6 +1424,19 @@ annotation_line__print(struct annotation_line *al, struct symbol *sym, u64 start
> > > printf(" : ");
> > > disasm_line__print(dl, start, addr_fmt_width);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Also color the filename and line if needed, with
> > > + * the same color than the percentage. Don't print it
> > > + * twice for close colored addr with the same filename:line
> > > + */
> > > + if (al->path) {
> > > + if (!prev_line || strcmp(prev_line, al->path)) {
> > > + color_fprintf(stdout, color, " // %s", al->path);
> > > + prev_line = al->path;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > printf("\n");
> > > } else if (max_lines && printed >= max_lines)
> > > return 1;
> > > @@ -1454,7 +1452,7 @@ annotation_line__print(struct annotation_line *al, struct symbol *sym, u64 start
> > > if (!*al->line)
> > > printf(" %*s:\n", width, " ");
> > > else
> > > - printf(" %*s: %*s %s\n", width, " ", addr_fmt_width, " ", al->line);
> > > + printf(" %*s: %-*d %s\n", width, " ", addr_fmt_width, al->line_nr, al->line);
> > > }
> > > return 0;
> > > --
> > > 2.30.1
> > >
> >
>
--
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists