[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1617779210-51576-9-git-send-email-tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:06:48 +0800
From: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>
To: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jirislaby@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@...neuler.org>,
Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Fix coding style issues of block comments
Fix coding style issues of block comments, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index df0b589..874d238 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -529,9 +529,11 @@ static void tty_ldisc_restore(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_ldisc *old)
const char *name = tty_name(tty);
pr_warn("Falling back ldisc for %s.\n", name);
- /* The traditional behaviour is to fall back to N_TTY, we
- want to avoid falling back to N_NULL unless we have no
- choice to avoid the risk of breaking anything */
+ /*
+ * The traditional behaviour is to fall back to N_TTY, we
+ * want to avoid falling back to N_NULL unless we have no
+ * choice to avoid the risk of breaking anything
+ */
if (tty_ldisc_failto(tty, N_TTY) < 0 &&
tty_ldisc_failto(tty, N_NULL) < 0)
panic("Couldn't open N_NULL ldisc for %s.", name);
@@ -600,17 +602,21 @@ int tty_set_ldisc(struct tty_struct *tty, int disc)
up_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
}
- /* At this point we hold a reference to the new ldisc and a
- reference to the old ldisc, or we hold two references to
- the old ldisc (if it was restored as part of error cleanup
- above). In either case, releasing a single reference from
- the old ldisc is correct. */
+ /*
+ * At this point we hold a reference to the new ldisc and a
+ * reference to the old ldisc, or we hold two references to
+ * the old ldisc (if it was restored as part of error cleanup
+ * above). In either case, releasing a single reference from
+ * the old ldisc is correct.
+ */
new_ldisc = old_ldisc;
out:
tty_ldisc_unlock(tty);
- /* Restart the work queue in case no characters kick it off. Safe if
- already running */
+ /*
+ * Restart the work queue in case no characters kick it off. Safe if
+ * already running
+ */
tty_buffer_restart_work(tty->port);
err:
tty_ldisc_put(new_ldisc); /* drop the extra reference */
@@ -812,8 +818,10 @@ void tty_ldisc_release(struct tty_struct *tty)
tty_ldisc_kill(o_tty);
tty_ldisc_unlock_pair(tty, o_tty);
- /* And the memory resources remaining (buffers, termios) will be
- disposed of when the kref hits zero */
+ /*
+ * And the memory resources remaining (buffers, termios) will be
+ * disposed of when the kref hits zero
+ */
tty_ldisc_debug(tty, "released\n");
}
--
2.8.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists