[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d0f254c3-0b63-e4d3-1f58-8940adc7c0bf@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 17:33:23 +0800
From: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
CC: <eric.auger.pro@...il.com>, <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>, <will@...nel.org>,
<maz@...nel.org>, <robin.murphy@....com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
<alex.williamson@...hat.com>, <tn@...ihalf.com>,
<zhukeqian1@...wei.com>, <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
<yi.l.liu@...el.com>, <wangxingang5@...wei.com>,
<jiangkunkun@...wei.com>, <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
<zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>, <zhangfei.gao@...il.com>,
<vivek.gautam@....com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
<nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, <lushenming@...wei.com>,
<vsethi@...dia.com>, <wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/13] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE
Hi Eric,
On 2021/2/24 5:06, Eric Auger wrote:
> +/*
> + * VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 18,
> + * struct vfio_iommu_type1_set_pasid_table)
> + *
> + * The SET operation passes a PASID table to the host while the
> + * UNSET operation detaches the one currently programmed. Setting
> + * a table while another is already programmed replaces the old table.
It looks to me that this description doesn't match the IOMMU part.
[v14,05/13] iommu/smmuv3: Implement attach/detach_pasid_table
| case IOMMU_PASID_CONFIG_TRANSLATE:
| /* we do not support S1 <-> S1 transitions */
| if (smmu_domain->s1_cfg.set)
| goto out;
Maybe I've misread something?
Thanks,
Zenghui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists