linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH] staging: emxx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e7a18709-0b26-751e-6ba4-b43dd89c203f@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:46:23 +0100
From:   Beatriz Martins de Carvalho <martinsdecarvalhobeatriz@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] staging: emxx_udc: Ending line with argument


Em 07/04/21 09:34, Greg KH escreveu:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:16:44AM +0100, Beatriz Martins de Carvalho wrote:
>> Em 07/04/21 06:37, Greg KH escreveu:
>>> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 09:00:07PM +0100, Beatriz Martins de Carvalho wrote:
>>>> Em 06/04/21 20:36, Greg KH escreveu:
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:34:09PM +0100, Beatriz Martins de Carvalho wrote:
>>>>>> Cleans up check of "Lines should not end with a '('"
>>>>>> with argument present in next line in file emxx_udc.c
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Beatriz Martins de Carvalho <martinsdecarvalhobeatriz@...il.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c | 11 ++++-------
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>> Why is this a [RESEND] ?
>>>>>
>>>>> What happened to the first version?
>>>> Sorry, I didn't receive your review, and in kernelnewbies tutorial, they say
>>>> if not receive a response, may have missed the patch, so I resent it.
>>> Do you have a pointer to your previous patch in the lore.kernel.org
>>> archives anywhere?  I can't seem to find it.
>>
>> I found this, it's what is you need?
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20210401195457.24512-1-martinsdecarvalhobeatriz@gmail.com/
> Ah, yes, I saw Julia's review and assumed you would fix up your patch
> based on her comments.  Please do not ignore review comments, it makes
> everyone's lives harder.
Sorry, I didn't fix up my patch based on her comments, because to do 
this was
to revert all my patch or will break a code line if I remaining within 80
characters. How the code line still stays between 85 or 90 I assumed 
that was
ok, so I was waiting for your review. Now I saw that I should send this 
answer
to her. What should I do with the patch?

Thank you for all reviews, I'm learning a lot about how to do a good
contribution and the importance of answer all reviews.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Beatriz Carvalho