[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YG2Cc+0rl4ndtGX4@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:59:15 +0300
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Cc: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>, kjlu@....edu,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: Fix rumtime PM imbalance on error
* Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com> [210407 07:46]:
> Hi,
>
> On 4/7/21 11:57 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com> [210407 06:20]:
> >> Do we need a Fixes: tag to enable stable backports?
> >
> > Well pm_runtime_resume_and_get() was introduced quite recently, and
> > we already handle the error and bail out. And likely after an error
> > not much works anyways :) So it might be better to add just a stable
> > tag v5.10 and later as further backports are not likely needed.
> >
>
> Agree this is not a critical patch for backport. But I do know that
> pm_runtime_resume_and_get() is backported to v5.4 stable kernel at least
> [1]. So stable tag with v5.4 perhaps would probably help tools looking
> for patches to backport.
OK no objections to adding a fixes tag.
Regards,
Tony
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/28/588
Powered by blists - more mailing lists