linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] percpu: partial chunk depopulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Apr 2021 13:09:47 +0200
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] percpu: partial chunk depopulation

On 4/1/21 11:42 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> In our production experience the percpu memory allocator is sometimes struggling
> with returning the memory to the system. A typical example is a creation of
> several thousands memory cgroups (each has several chunks of the percpu data
> used for vmstats, vmevents, ref counters etc). Deletion and complete releasing
> of these cgroups doesn't always lead to a shrinkage of the percpu memory.
> 
> The underlying problem is the fragmentation: to release an underlying chunk
> all percpu allocations should be released first. The percpu allocator tends
> to top up chunks to improve the utilization. It means new small-ish allocations
> (e.g. percpu ref counters) are placed onto almost filled old-ish chunks,
> effectively pinning them in memory.
> 
> This patchset pretends to solve this problem by implementing a partial

Really "pretends"? :) Or did you mean "attempts"?