| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210407120530.dgcsuyywbaz4fllm@wittgenstein>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:05:30 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Cc: zohar@...ux.ibm.com, mjg59@...gle.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] evm: Allow setxattr() and setattr() for
unmodified metadata
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 12:52:49PM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> With the patch to allow xattr/attr operations if a portable signature
> verification fails, cp and tar can copy all xattrs/attrs so that at the
> end of the process verification succeeds.
>
> However, it might happen that the xattrs/attrs are already set to the
> correct value (taken at signing time) and signature verification succeeds
> before the copy has completed. For example, an archive might contains files
> owned by root and the archive is extracted by root.
>
> Then, since portable signatures are immutable, all subsequent operations
> fail (e.g. fchown()), even if the operation is legitimate (does not alter
> the current value).
>
> This patch avoids this problem by reporting successful operation to user
> space when that operation does not alter the current value of xattrs/attrs.
>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
> Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> ---
> security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> index 74f9f3a2ae53..2a8fcba67d47 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/integrity.h>
> #include <linux/evm.h>
> #include <linux/magic.h>
> +#include <linux/posix_acl_xattr.h>
>
> #include <crypto/hash.h>
> #include <crypto/hash_info.h>
> @@ -328,6 +329,89 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_current_integrity(struct dentry *dentry)
> return evm_verify_hmac(dentry, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * evm_xattr_acl_change - check if passed ACL changes the inode mode
> + * @mnt_userns: user namespace of the idmapped mount
> + * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry
> + * @xattr_name: requested xattr
> + * @xattr_value: requested xattr value
> + * @xattr_value_len: requested xattr value length
> + *
> + * Check if passed ACL changes the inode mode, which is protected by EVM.
> + *
> + * Returns 1 if passed ACL causes inode mode change, 0 otherwise.
> + */
> +static int evm_xattr_acl_change(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> + struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
> + const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len)
> +{
> + umode_t mode;
> + struct posix_acl *acl = NULL, *acl_res;
> + struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
> + int rc;
> +
> + /* user_ns is not relevant here, ACL_USER/ACL_GROUP don't have impact
> + * on the inode mode (see posix_acl_equiv_mode()).
> + */
> + acl = posix_acl_from_xattr(&init_user_ns, xattr_value, xattr_value_len);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(acl))
> + return 1;
> +
> + acl_res = acl;
> + /* Passing mnt_userns is necessary to correctly determine the GID in
> + * an idmapped mount, as the GID is used to clear the setgid bit in
> + * the inode mode.
> + */
> + rc = posix_acl_update_mode(mnt_userns, inode, &mode, &acl_res);
> +
> + posix_acl_release(acl);
> +
> + if (rc)
> + return 1;
> +
> + if (inode->i_mode != mode)
> + return 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * evm_xattr_change - check if passed xattr value differs from current value
> + * @mnt_userns: user namespace of the idmapped mount
> + * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry
> + * @xattr_name: requested xattr
> + * @xattr_value: requested xattr value
> + * @xattr_value_len: requested xattr value length
> + *
> + * Check if passed xattr value differs from current value.
> + *
> + * Returns 1 if passed xattr value differs from current value, 0 otherwise.
> + */
> +static int evm_xattr_change(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> + struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
> + const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len)
> +{
> + char *xattr_data = NULL;
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> + if (posix_xattr_acl(xattr_name))
> + return evm_xattr_acl_change(mnt_userns, dentry, xattr_name,
> + xattr_value, xattr_value_len);
> +
> + rc = vfs_getxattr_alloc(&init_user_ns, dentry, xattr_name, &xattr_data,
> + 0, GFP_NOFS);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return 1;
> +
> + if (rc == xattr_value_len)
> + rc = memcmp(xattr_value, xattr_data, rc);
Afaik memcmp() can return values greater than 1 and less than 0 so it
might make sense to explicitly do sm like:
rc = memcmp() ? 1 : 0;
or
!!memcmp()
or alter the comment for evm_xattr_change().
other than that
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
> + else
> + rc = 1;
> +
> + kfree(xattr_data);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * evm_protect_xattr - protect the EVM extended attribute
> *
> @@ -389,6 +473,11 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE)
> return 0;
>
> + if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE &&
> + !evm_xattr_change(mnt_userns, dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value,
> + xattr_value_len))
> + return 0;
> +
> if (evm_status != INTEGRITY_PASS)
> integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry),
> dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata",
> @@ -532,6 +621,19 @@ void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name)
> evm_update_evmxattr(dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> +static int evm_attr_change(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
> + unsigned int ia_valid = attr->ia_valid;
> +
> + if ((!(ia_valid & ATTR_UID) || uid_eq(attr->ia_uid, inode->i_uid)) &&
> + (!(ia_valid & ATTR_GID) || gid_eq(attr->ia_gid, inode->i_gid)) &&
> + (!(ia_valid & ATTR_MODE) || attr->ia_mode == inode->i_mode))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * evm_inode_setattr - prevent updating an invalid EVM extended attribute
> * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry
> @@ -562,6 +664,11 @@ int evm_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
> (evm_status == INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE) ||
> (evm_ignore_error_safe(evm_status)))
> return 0;
> +
> + if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE &&
> + !evm_attr_change(dentry, attr))
> + return 0;
> +
> integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry),
> dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata",
> integrity_status_msg[evm_status], -EPERM, 0);
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists